When you have butter, why seek ghee?

The finance minister is looking at various options to contain the fiscal deficit. Here’s a look at a number of solutions that he readily has at hand.

There is an ancient Tamil saying that a person holding butter in his hand goes looking out for ghee. It means that a person should look at what he has in hand before searching for other solutions.

The Budget deficit is at an uncomfortable level, and the finance minister should be looking for solutions. The Central deficit is over 6.5% and the combined deficit of the States and Centre is over 12%.  New demands for subsidies are cropping up all the time.

Clearly, the finance minister will have to look at various options to increase revenues.  

The first step to be taken is to examine the solutions at hand carefully.

Let’s look at the issue of service tax, which is now being levied on a large number of services. Though a strong case can be made to increase the ambit of service tax so that it includes a number of services, a number of anomalies exist in the current system.

For example, under legal consultancy services, services provided by individuals are exempted from service tax. But if corporate legal entities are being taxed, why are individuals who provide the same services outside the tax net?

In the case of barbers and beauticians, individuals are taxed. Again, in the case of legal services, why are individuals excluded?

Another glaring anomaly is with regard to the medical profession, which is wholly excluded. It is common knowledge that lawyers and doctors are among the highest earners in India. If the services of hair-dressers and beauty parlours are taxed, it would indeed be appropriate if lawyers and doctors earning above the exemption limit of Rs10 lakh are also taxed.

If the tax net is expanded in this fashion, it will fetch an additional income of about Rs10,000 crore for the government and help in reducing the fiscal deficit.

Efforts have been made to justify the exemption for doctors on the grounds that they render services to the poor. Even if this argument is accepted, there is a strong case for applying an exemption limit of Rs10 lakh for medical professionals.
Only the doctors working for five-star hospitals and private clinics, earning above Rs10 lakh should be taxed.

Let’s shift our focus to the legal profession. The reason given for not taxing lawyers is not tenable. To say that they are serving the court is specious reasoning. Lawyers are not being paid by the court or at rates fixed by the court.

The cases mentioned above are clear opportunities for the finance minister to raise more revenues.

Keeping the above factors in mind, let’s examine the various categories on which the current burden of service tax falls:

Cosmetic and plastic surgery services

These include services provided or to be provided to any person, by any other person, in relation to cosmetic surgery or plastic surgery, but does not include any surgery undertaken to restore or reconstruct anatomy or functions of body affected due to congenital defects, developmental abnormalities, degenerative diseases, injury or trauma.{break}

Company Secretaries

These include services provided or to be provided to any person by a practicing Company Secretary to a client in his professional capacity in any manner.

However, the services provided by a Company Secretary representing a client for any proceedings initialled by issue of a notice, before any statutory authority, are fully exempt from tax.

Clubs or associations

These include services provided or to be provided to its members by any club or association in relation to provision of services, facilities or advantages either for a subscription or any other amount.

Beauty parlours

Services provided or to be provided to any person by a beauty parlour to a customer in relation to beauty treatment—this includes hair cutting, hair dyeing, hair dressing, face and beauty treatment, cosmetic treatment, manicure, pedicure or counselling services on beauty, face care or make up or such other similar services.

Dry cleaners

Services provided or to be provided to any person in relation to dry cleaning.

Health clubs and fitness centres

These include services provided or to be provided to any person by a health club and fitness centre in relation to health and fitness services.

Legal consultancy services

These include services provided or to be provided to a business entity by any other business entity. Services shall be related to advice, consultancy or assistance in any branch of law.

In this case a ‘business entity’ includes an association of persons, body of individuals, company or firm but does not include an individual.

Real-estate agents

These include services provided or to be provided to any person, by a real-estate agent in relation to real estate.

In this case, a ‘real-estate agent’ means a person who is engaged in rendering any service in relation to sale, purchase, leasing or renting, of real estate and includes a real-estate consultant.

A ‘real-estate consultant’ means a person who renders in any manner, conception, design, development, construction, implementation, supervision, maintenance, marketing, acquisition or management, of real estate.

(The writer is former SEBI chairman, former chairman-Disinvestment Commission and former member, Planning Commission of India)
 

Comments
ADVISOR
1 decade ago
Doctors and Lawyers do pay income tax.

Many of them are SELF EMPLOYED.

Hence service tax if imposed should be only for hospitals and legal firms that exceed an annual turnover of more than Rs.50 Lakhs.

Even then,as being followed now, service tax will be passed on to the patients and the clients making them only to pay more and suffer.

On the other hand,it is worth considering levying service tax on ALL RETIRED I.A.S OFFICERS,JUDGES most of whom render services after retirement to several corporates in India and Abroad by getting into the board,doing liason/agency works,acting as advisors and get extra income IN ADDITION TO THE PENSION including getting REAPPOINTED as COMMISSION CHAIRMAN,CHAIRMAN OF INQUIRY COMMITTEES,PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS etc. which results in the drain of the tax payer money along with other perks enjoyed by them such as free air travel, continuance of security, staff etc.

Any such ADDITIONAL INCOME or BENEFITS to ANYONE AFTER THE RETIREMENT DATE need to be considered as ADDITIONAL SERVICE REMUNERATION and should be subjected to the SERVICE TAX.

Even the SECURITY PROVIDED to anyone after their retirement is a SERVICE by the Govt. and need to be taxed from their PERKS other than the PENSION.

If these GUIDELINES are implemented by the HON'BLE PRIME MINISTER and HON'BLE FINANCE MINISTER without FEAR OR FAVOUR, this WILL REVAMP INDIA by providing ADDITIONAL REVENUE without burdening the common man and also would PAVE WAY FOR YOUNGSTERS TO PLAY ROLE IN GOVT.ADMINISTRATION.

As of now,SEVERAL POSITIONS have been BLOCKED by RETAINING THE RETIRED BY RE-EMPLOYMENT in ONE WAY OR THE OTHER resulting in INDIA SAILING ONLY BY THE OLDMEN WAY.

The FACT is that in INDIA still the OLD RULE and SEVERAL YOUNGSTERS born after the Independence in 1947 have not been given the opportunity in KEY DECISION MAKING or POLICY MAKING and they have now crossed the age above 60 !.

The OLD STILL RULES ,ruining India and the revamp is essential both in the administration and in the Tax Structure .
sreepathi
1 decade ago
The service tax is going to be added and the customer has to bear this additional expenditure even though most of the times " NO SERVICE IS RENDERED" by either doctors nor lawyers.
VIJAY
1 decade ago
any addition on this account will be passed on seeking justice
Bankim Shah
1 decade ago
gr8 ideas.
keep it up.

hope they reach to ministries, activists, right forums

best luck
Shadi Katyal
1 decade ago
The one question which comes to mind is that how long this populism is going to go on and bankrupt the nation. Deficit budget is the cause of price rises and thus catch 22. This has to be controlled first before even thinking of new taxes.
India is one of the most taxed nation and burden is mostly on the middle classes.Some of subsidies will have to be abolished and some of the surcharges will have to go.
Look at all the Yojna but does the money thus spend even reaches the poor. where is the accountability of any such projects?
Since govt is Mai Baap everyone wants some subsidy from sarkar and thus we are making fools of ourselves with such populism.
Govt must put its foot down on all states for their budget deficit.
Progress of nation is by lower taxation and thus savings and investment and not by methods used in past 60 years of taxation and subsidies.
M.R.Borkar
1 decade ago
I do agree with Mr.Ramakrishnan. I wud be happy if he had includes all
the "so called Janasevaks" as they
also provide service to 'themselves' not Janata.
Shibaji Dash
1 decade ago
Personal compulsions, historically , in most countries have had a significant but invisible role in determining who should be taxed and how much if at all to be taxed and what should be the exclusion, exemption, rate etc. Regan had unhappy experience in his wife's tax assessments when he was in Hollywood. On becoming President he went tong and hammer against the tax regime he inherited. If Sir PC had not been the FM service tax would have been imposed on lawyers. Doctors - even the rich ones- were spared as otherwise it would have been difficult to justify non-levy of service tax on the lawyers. We can't expect the present FM to undo what Sir PC did as it would be impolite and politically not correct since Sir PC has the formidable reputation as a very competent minister even as Home Minister. It's only a question of time before the inequities and consequent loss of revenue as pointed out by Mr Ramakrishna- GVR as he used to be called--are done away with.
ArrayArray
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback