Vedanta Is Crippling Hindustan Zinc To Repay Foreign Debt, Alleges Former Secretary EAS Sarma
Moneylife Digital Team 18 July 2025
Vedanta group is crippling Hindustan Zinc Ltd (HZL) by diverting its profits to repay the debt of its London-based parent company, Vedanta Resources Ltd (VRL), warns former power and finance secretary EAS Sarma in a letter to Union minister for mines G Kishan Reddy. Mr Sarma’s letter, reviewed by Moneylife, also raises alarm over the Union government’s recent decision to allot a highly valuable potash mineral block to Vedanta-controlled HZL, despite what he calls the company’s poor track record in managing India’s zinc resources.
 
Mr Sarma points to repeated excessive dividend payouts by HZL, which holds critical zinc mining assets, and in which the government still owns a 29.54% stake. According to the former secretary, these payouts — year after year—may seem beneficial to the exchequer in the short term, but over 63% of the dividends are routed to Vedanta, which uses the funds to service the mounting debt of its parent entity, VRL.
 
He questions the financial rationale behind these payouts, particularly when HZL’s annual profits may not always justify such largesse. "This could amount to a violation of Section 123 of the Companies Act," Mr Sarma warns, adding that had Vedanta reinvested in zinc exploration, it wouldn’t have generated enough surplus to pay such high dividends in the first place.
 
The real cost, he argues, is being borne by India’s long-term mineral security. Citing official data, Sarma says that in 2013, India’s zinc reserves were projected to last 11 years at the then-current production rate. Today, due to aggressive mining and a lack of fresh exploration, that timeline has fallen to less than seven years. At the current extraction rate of 17mn (million) tonnes of zinc ore annually — with 30% of the metal being exported — India could soon run out of domestic zinc reserves altogether, he warns.
 
Mr Sarma describes this as a deliberate depletion driven by Vedanta’s need to syphon HZL’s resources for its parent’s financial obligations. "Neither the ministry of mines nor the ministry of finance (MoF) has intervened to enforce a prudent dividend policy or to ensure that India’s zinc production remains sustainable," he writes.
 
The latest flashpoint is the Union government's decision to allot the Jhandawali–Satipura Amalgamated Potash and Halite Block in Rajasthan to HZL. The block is estimated to hold over 100mn tonnes of potash ore — a critical input for fertilisers. 
 
India currently imports 100% of its potash requirement, over 2mn tonnes annually. Mr Sarma values the block at over US$35bn (billion) at current market prices and calls its handover to Vedanta 'a grave policy error'.
 
He argues that instead of developing the block with its own capital, Vedanta may simply hypothecate it to raise loans from public sector banks (PSBs), shifting financial risk to the banking system and ultimately to depositors. "It is almost like giving away a national asset on a silver platter," he remarks.
 
Mr Sarma also refers to his earlier correspondence with the ministry of mines, MoF and ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) in which he had repeatedly flagged how Vedanta’s practices were damaging HZL’s ability to maintain a healthy reserve-to-production ratio.
 
He concludes the letter by calling for a judicial inquiry into the alleged mismanagement of HZL and the diversion of national mineral wealth to benefit Vedanta. As an alternative, he urges the ministry to review HZL’s dividend policy in the larger public interest and reconsider awarding strategic mineral blocks to private companies. Instead, he recommends that such assets be given to central public sector enterprises (CPSEs), which, in his view, are more accountable and aligned with public welfare.
Comments
vraghunathan427
9 months ago
Why is Mr Sarma not speaking about the actual dividends received from HZL before it was divested and Vedanta took a majority share?

Distributable profits has been at such levels that they have supported dividends payouts to GOI as well as Vedanta and other investors.

GOI may have got back many times its original investment in HZL, by way of dividends under VEDL leadership. Ultimately, GOI, as a stake holder with veto power, knows that it needs recurring dividends from HZL. Instead if fixating on some future rainbow.

Regarding, potash fertilizer raw material Mines. GOI should fix clear rules on development of the Mines, with timelines. India is in dire need of potash and Vedanta has to be monitored to deliver.
indermodiadvisers
9 months ago
Mr Sarma is ignorant about Economics and Business. He should join some good management course to update himself.
anil
9 months ago
1. Dividends Are a Legitimate Return of Capital to Shareholders
Shareholder Rights: Dividends are a lawful distribution of profits to shareholders, as permitted under Section 123 of the Companies Act. The allegation that this violates corporate law is baseless—dividend payouts are approved by HZL’s board and shareholders, including the Government of India (29.54% stakeholder).

Efficient Capital Allocation: If HZL has no immediate need for surplus cash (e.g., lack of viable exploration projects or expansion plans), returning capital to shareholders is economically rational. Retaining unutilized cash erodes shareholder value due to inflation and opportunity costs.

2. Vedanta’s Debt Management is Prudent
Healthy Debt-to-Equity Ratio (0.85): This ratio indicates a balanced capital structure. Vedanta Resources Ltd (VRL) is leveraging HZL’s dividends to service debt—a standard practice for holding companies. There is no "siphoning"; dividends are legitimate returns to a majority shareholder.

Global Precedent: Multinational corporations routinely use dividends from subsidiaries to service parent-level debt (e.g., Unilever, Tata Group). This is neither illegal nor unethical.

3. Zinc Reserves Depletion: A Misleading Narrative
Mining Efficiency ? Mismanagement: The reduction in reserve timelines (11 years to 7 years) reflects higher production efficiency, not reckless exploitation. HZL has consistently invested in mining technology to maximize output—a positive for India’s industrial growth.

Exploration Investments: Vedanta has allocated funds for exploration, but viable zinc deposits are finite. Blaming Vedanta for geological constraints ignores market realities.

4. Potash Block Allocation: A Strategic Opportunity
Reducing Import Dependence: India imports 100% of its potash (2MT/year). Allocating the Jhandawali–Satipura block to HZL—a company with mining expertise—could cut import bills and boost domestic fertilizer production.

Hypothecation Claims Are Speculative: The article assumes Vedanta will misuse the block for loans without evidence. HZL’s track record in Rajasthan (e.g., Sindesar Khurd Mine) proves its capability to develop mineral assets.

5. Government Oversight Exists
SEBI & MCA Compliance: As a listed company, HZL’s financial decisions are scrutinized by regulators. The Government of India, as a minority shareholder, has voting rights to oppose unfair dividends if warranted. Its silence implies consent.

Dividend Policy Transparency: HZL’s dividend history is publicly disclosed. High payouts reflect strong cash flows, not exploitation.

6. Public Sector Alternatives Are Not Superior
CPSEs’ Track Record: Central public sector enterprises (CPSEs) like Coal India have faced criticism for inefficiency and stagnation. Private sector participation drives competition and productivity.

FDI and Growth: Vedanta’s investments in HZL have made India the world’s 2nd-largest zinc producer. Nationalizing resources would deter foreign investment.

Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback