US Judge Orders Google To Share Search Data, Rejects Chrome Sale in Antitrust Ruling

Moneylife Digital Team 03 September 2025

Investor Interest

A federal judge issued a landmark ruling on Google’s dominance in online search, mandating the company to share certain search data with competitors while rejecting the US government’s bid to force a breakup or sell off its Chrome browser.

US district judge Amit Mehta, presiding over a nearly five-year-old antitrust case, outlined a sweeping 226-page decision aimed at restoring competition in the search engine market without dismantling Google’s core products. The ruling comes as artificial intelligence (AI) innovations, particularly generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Perplexity, threaten to challenge Google’s longstanding control over internet search.

The department of justice (DoJ) had argued that Google maintained an illegal monopoly through exclusive deals with device-makers, such as Apple and Samsung, which positioned Google’s search engine as the default on billions of phones and computers. These agreements reportedly generated more than US$26bn (billion) annually.

While judge Mehta ordered Google to roll back exclusive arrangements, he allowed the company to continue preloading its products as long as the deals were non-exclusive.

Significantly, the court rejected the DoJ’s request to force Google to divest Chrome, a cornerstone of the company’s search ecosystem. Judge Mehta wrote that a divestiture would be “incredibly messy and highly risky,” noting that the company’s market dominance could not be solely attributed to illegal conduct but also to superior products and historic growth.

Instead, the judge mandated that Google provide rivals with access to certain search index and user interaction data, though advertising data remains protected. A technological oversight committee will monitor compliance for six years. The ruling is intended to foster competition while balancing innovation and privacy concerns.

During the remedies trial, Google's chief executive officer (CEO) Sundar Pichai had testified that sharing data could allow competitors to reverse-engineer proprietary technology. In response to the ruling, Google stated it is reviewing the orders and raised concerns about potential impacts on user privacy.

DoJ welcomed the decision, describing it as a step toward restoring competition. “We will continue to review the opinion to consider the Department’s options and next steps regarding seeking additional relief,” says assistant attorney general Abigail Slater.

The ruling also carries implications for the rapidly evolving AI sector. DoJ had argued that Google could leverage its search index and AI products, including its Gemini chatbot, to dominate emerging AI markets.

Judge Mehta’s decision requires limited data-sharing, acknowledging the competitive landscape in AI and the growing influence of generative technologies, which he said “pose a threat to the primacy of traditional internet search.”

Industry experts have noted that while the ruling curbs some anti-competitive practices, it may offer limited advantages to major AI competitors like OpenAI, Meta, and Perplexity, but could aid smaller companies seeking access to search data.

The case marks a rare judicial intervention aimed at reining in one of the world’s largest tech giants without resorting to a full-scale breakup, striking a middle path between fostering competition and preserving innovation. Google has announced plans to appeal the ruling, meaning compliance with the new mandates could take years to be fully enforced.

Comments