Tata vs Mistry: SC Dismisses Review Petitions by Mistry against March 2021 Judgement
The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed review petitions filed on behalf of Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd and Sterling Investments Pvt Ltd seeking review of the apex court's March 2021 judgement upholding Tata group's decision to remove Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of Tata Sons.
 
A bench headed by chief justice NV Ramana dismissed the review petitions.
 
In a separate application for expunging remarks, the top court agreed to expunge certain remarks made against Mr Mistry, but has also directed that certain offensive paragraphs directed against the court made in the application for expunction be deleted/withdrawn.
 
In February this year, the top court had agreed to hear review petitions filed by Cyrus Investments and Sterling Investments against the apex court verdict, where it accepted all contentions of the Tata conglomerate and set aside the order of the NCLAT (national company law appellate tribunal) which restored Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of the Tata conglomerate.
 
In March last year, a bench headed by then Chief Justice SA Bobde said all questions of law are in favour of Tata group and dismissed the appeals filed by Mr Mistry. The top court also upheld the Tata Sons decision to sack Cyrus Mistry on 24 October 2016.
 
In February this year, a bench headed by chief justice NV Ramana and comprising justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian considered the review petition filed by Mr Mistry. Justice Ramasubramanian dissented.
 
The top court, in its 15th February order, said: "Applications seeking exemption from filing affidavits are allowed. Applications seeking oral hearing of the Review Petitions are allowed. List the Review Petitions on Wednesday, the 9th March 2022."
 
Justice Ramasubramanian, in his dissenting opinion, said: "With utmost respect, I regret my inability to agree with the order. I have carefully gone through the Review Petitions and I do not find any valid ground to review the judgement. The grounds raised in the Review Petitions do not fall within the parameters of a review and hence the applications seeking oral hearing deserve to be dismissed."
 
In the verdict passed on 26th March last year, the top court said: "We find all the questions of law are liable to be answered in favour of the appellants (Tata Group) and the appeals filed by the Tata Group are liable to be allowed and Shapoorji Pallonji group is liable to be dismissed."
 
It also said the value of SP Group shares will depend on the valuation by Tata Sons equities and the court will not determine the fair value. In December 2019, NCLAT had ruled that the proceedings of the Board meeting of Tata Sons held on 24 October 2016 removing Cyrus Mistry as chairperson was illegal.
 
Senior advocates Harish N Salve and AM Singhvi, appeared for Tata, assisted by a team from Karanjawala & Co advocates led by advocate Ruby Singh Ahuja.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
Comments
saharaaj
1 month ago
Mistry do more extensive and intensive home work on the subject and wait for Achhe din
Edtech platform Vedantu lays off 424 more employees
IANS 19 May 2022
Edtech platform Vedantu has laid off 424 more employees, nearly 7 per cent of its workforce, as the online education space shrinks in the country.
 
"There is no easy way to say this but I am truly sorry. Out of 5900 Vedans...
SC Agrees To List SFIO's Plea Challenging Delhi HC Relief to Sahara Group Companies
IANS 17 May 2022
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to list a plea by SFIO (serious fraud investigation office) challenging a Delhi High Court (HC) order, which stayed the investigation into companies related to the Sahara group.
 
A plea...
Twitter deal 'cannot move forward' until CEO proves bot numbers: Musk
IANS 17 May 2022
Tech billionaire Elon Musk on Tuesday said that the $44 billion Twitter deal "cannot move forward" until the micro-blogging site's CEO Parag Agrawal proves the bot numbers.
 
In a series of tweets, Musk mentioned that the...
Million Rupee Cars, UVs Selling Five Times Faster Than Lower-priced Ones: Report
Moneylife Digital Team 16 May 2022
Over the past two fiscals, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the dynamics of many an industry. The passenger vehicles segment is one such. During the past fiscal, passenger cars priced Rs10 lakh (Rs1 million) and above sold five...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback