FOUNDATION MAGAZINE FINANCIAL ADVICE STOCKLETTERS PORTFOLIO PMS BOOKS
BUY
Supreme Court Urges States To Frame Policy To Deter Private Hospitals from Fleecing Patients
Ummar Jamal (Bar  and  Bench) 19 March 2025
Life
The Supreme Court recently urged State governments to take a policy call on how to curb unreasonable charges and the exploitation of patients in private hospitals (Siddharth Dalmia & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.).
 
A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotishwar Singh opined that it may not be advisable for the Supreme Court itself to interfere with the issue by issuing mandatory directions.
 
The Court reasoned that if it were to issue such directions, it may hamper the growth of hospitals in the private sector. The Court added that this issue should ideally be dealt with by way of State policies. 
 
"Policy-makers are the best equipped to take a holistic view and formulate the guidelines as may be required, to safeguard the patients or their attendants from exploitation while simultaneously, ensuring that there is no discouragement and unreasonable restriction on private entities from entering the health sector," the Court said. 
 
The Court, therefore, directed all States to take a policy call on this issue. 
 
"It may not be advisable for this Court to issue mandatory directions which may hamper the growth of hospitals in the private sector; but parallelly, it is necessary to sensitize the State Governments re: the problem of unreasonable charges and exploitation of patients in private hospitals. Consequently, we dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to all the State Governments to consider this issue and take appropriate policy decisions as they may deem fit," the March 4 ruling said. 
 
The Court was dealing with a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea that called for directions to restrain hospitals from compelling patients to buy medicines and medical supplies exclusively from in-house pharmacies at allegedly exorbitant rates.
 
The petitioners claimed that private hospitals and nursing homes were systematically overcharging patients by making it mandatory to buy medicines and medical supplies from their affiliated pharmacies.
 
The case was triggered by the personal experience of the petitioners after a family member underwent treatment for cancer and had to pay exorbitant charges for medicines.
 
The petitioners contended that such practices amounted to economic exploitation and violated the right to health under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 
 
They further argued that the lack of regulatory mechanisms had enabled private hospitals to impose unreasonable charges. They, therefore, sought judicial intervention to prevent such coercive practices.
 
The Court acknowledged that providing medical facilities to all is a fundamental aspect of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. 
 
However, given the country's vast population, the Court observed that States have struggled to build sufficient medical infrastructure. To address this, the government encouraged private entities to establish hospitals, resulting in the growth of renowned private healthcare institutions in India, rivalling top hospitals worldwide.
 
"It, therefore, must be acknowledged that not only the people, even the States look towards these private entities to provide basic and specialized medical facilities to the public at large," the Court said.
 
The Court proceeded to observe that it cannot issue any direction that may hamper the growth of private healthcare institutions. Instead, it called on States to take a policy call on such issues. 
 
Comments
GOWRISHANKAR
4 weeks ago
If the present policy of the present Government being 'Sab Kaa Saath, Sab ka Vikaas' is of any relevance then this issue should be an eye-opener. Can someone tell me as to how many Politicians get their medical treatment from Government Hospitals? Perhaps 1 out of 100 if not less. These guys send their family members to Corporate Hospitals and what's worse - in some cases, the State ex-chequer is made to foot the bill. This is the kind of inclusive politics. This is nothing short of atrocity, making the tax-payer to pay the bills when everything is free for these useless politicians.
Reply
parimalshah1
1 month ago
The policy of making it mandatory to buy medicines and medical supplies from their affiliated pharmacies could have been struck down by the court.
Reply
Life
Misleading Medical Ads: Supreme Court Flags Lack of Action by States
Ritwik Choudhury (Bar  and  Bench) 25 February 2025
The Supreme Court on Monday took exception to the lack of action by States over their failure to act against misleading medical advertisements (Indian Medical Association v. Union of India).
 
The Bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and...
Life
Aveo Pharma Raided after BBC Sting Operation Exposes Sale of Opioids to West African Countries
Moneylife Digital Team 24 February 2025
The Indian government has taken decisive action against Aveo Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Aveo) after a BBC investigation alleged that the company was illegally exporting unapproved opioid combinations to West Africa. The exposé, which...
Life
Bald Virus? No, 14-times Higher Level of Selenium in Wheat Led to 300 People Suffering Hair Loss in Maharashtra's Buldhana District
Moneylife Digital Team 24 February 2025
Maharashtra’s Buldhana district has been gripped by a health crisis, with over 300 residents across 15 villages experiencing sudden and severe hair loss. Initially feared to be a mysterious 'bald virus', experts have now attributed...
  • EDITORS'
    PICKS
  • MOST
    POPULAR
  • MOST
    READ
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback
Buy Now!

Absolute Power

Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam

View Options

The Scam: Now in it's 12th Printing

29 Years Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
#Scam92: Read the actual story.

Buy Now Gift Know More

Moneylife Online Magazine

Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.

1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.

Buy Now Gift Know More

Monthly Digital Access

Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.

30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.

Buy Now Know More

Full Archive access

Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )

Buy Now

Stockletters in 5 Flavours

Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year

Buy Now Know More

MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory

(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)

Buy Now Know More
We are listening!
Reset
Success!

To continue

Please

or

With