Supreme Court Orders States To Frame Rules on Pedestrian Movement, Non-motorised Vehicles on Roads
Ummar Jamal (Bar  and  Bench) 07 October 2025
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered all States and Union Territories (UTs) to frame rules within six months on road safety by regulating the movement of non-motorised vehicles (cycles, hand carts and so on) and pedestrians in public spaces, and by monitoring construction and maintenance of roads (S Rajaseekaran vs. Union of India and Others).
 
A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan directed all States and UTs to frame such rules under Sections 138 (1A) and 210D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act). These provisions were inserted in the MV Act by way of a 2019 amendment
 
Section 138(1A) of the MV Act empowers States to make road safety rules to regulate the movement of non-mechanically propelled vehicles and pedestrians in public places. 
 
It adds that if such rules are sought to be put in place by States in relation to national highways, the same should be framed in consultation with the National Highways Authority of India.
 
Section 210D, meanwhile, says that States can make rules for the design, construction, and maintenance standards for roads other than national highways. 
 
The Court has now ordered the framing of such rules within six months, if they have not yet been framed. 
 
A detailed copy of the order is now awaited.
 
The order was passed on a petition filed in 2012 by a Coimbatore-based orthopaedic surgeon who had raised concerns about the large number of road accidents that occur in India.
 
The petitioner sought directions to the Union Road Transport Ministry to take coordinated efforts to prevent road accidents. 
 
He also sought directions to improve existing infrastructure and facilities catering to post-accident care to minimize the loss of life and physical injuries to victims of road accidents.
 
Over the years, the Courtrpa passed several directions in the matter, including for the formation of a steering committee to address road safety issues flagged in the case, and for the enforcement of the Motor Vehicles Act, in particular Section 136A (electronic monitoring and enforcement of road safety).
 
In August last year, the Court added that it will also consider issuing directions for the formation of State and Central portals to facilitate the payment of compensation to victims of road accidents. 
 
Comments
Bombay HC Slams Private Redevelopment of Govt Land in South Mumbai; Says ‘Slum Rehabilitation Cannot Be a Cover for Land Grab’
Moneylife Digital Team 07 October 2025
In a scathing observation over the proposed private redevelopment of government land in one of Mumbai’s most valuable precincts, the Bombay High Court (HC) has questioned the legality of allowing 33 acres of state-owned land at Cuffe...
Kerala Becomes 1st State To Make AI-based Witness Recording Mandatory in All Courts
Moneylife Digital Team 07 October 2025
In a first-of-its-kind move in the Indian judiciary, the Kerala High Court (HC) has directed that all trial courts across the state must mandatorily adopt Adalat.AI, an artificial intelligence-based speech-to-text transcription tool,...
These Things Do Not Affect Me: CJI BR Gavai after Lawyer Attempts To Attack Him in Supreme Court
Bar  and  Bench 06 October 2025
A lawyer tried to attack Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai in the Supreme Court on Monday.
 
The drama unfolded when the Bench led by the CJI was hearing mentioning of cases by lawyers.
 
According to sources, the lawyer went...
NBDSA Pulls Up Zee News, Times Now Navbharat and India TV for Biased, Communal Broadcasts; Orders Removal of ‘Jihad’ Narratives and Bahraich Violence Debate
Moneylife Digital Team 06 October 2025
Self-regulatory body News Broadcasting and Digital Standards Authority (NBDSA) has issued a series of strongly worded orders against Zee News, Times Now, Navbharat and India TV for airing programmes that violated neutrality and...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback