Stronger Banks To Pay Less Deposit Insurance Premiums as RBI Clears Risk-based Framework
Moneylife Digital Team 09 February 2026
In a significant shift in how India prices deposit insurance, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC), have decided to move away from a flat premium system and introduce a risk-based premium framework for insured banks from 1 April 2026. For depositors, the change does not alter insurance coverage limits, but it does aim to make the insurance system itself more robust. For banks, especially those with cleaner balance sheets, the framework could translate into meaningful cost savings over time.
 
Under the new framework, banks that manage risks better and maintain stronger balance sheets will pay lower deposit insurance premiums, while weaker or riskier institutions will continue to pay the existing rate. The move marks the most fundamental change in deposit insurance pricing since the scheme was introduced in 1962.
 
At present, all insured banks pay a uniform premium of 12 paise per ₹100 of assessable deposits per year, regardless of their financial health. While simple to administer, the flat-rate system has long been criticised for failing to distinguish between well-managed banks and those carrying higher risks.
 
RBI says the new risk-based premium (RBP) framework is aimed at incentivising sound risk management and improving the long-term resilience of the deposit insurance fund (DIF), which is used to protect depositors in the event of bank failures.
 
According to RBI and DICGC, banks will now be assessed and categorised based on their risk profile, using a structured internal rating methodology. Based on this assessment, banks will be placed into one of four risk categories, like A, B, C or D, with category A representing the lowest risk.
 
Premium rates under the new system will range from 8 paise to 12 paise per ₹100 of assessable deposits per year. Banks in the safest category will enjoy a discount of up to 33.33% compared with the current flat rate, while those in the riskiest category will continue to pay the full 12 paise.
 
For scheduled commercial banks (excluding regional rural banks-RRBs), the risk assessment will be carried out under a tier-1 model. This combines supervisory ratings, quantitative financial parameters such as capital adequacy, asset quality, liquidity and profitability, and an assessment of the potential loss a bank’s failure could pose to the deposit insurance fund.
 
A separate tier-2 model will apply to RRBs, cooperative banks and urban cooperative banks (UCBs). In their case, ratings will be based on quantitative indicators and potential loss to the insurance fund, with added emphasis on governance parameters such as the presence of mandated management and board structures.
 
Local area banks and payments banks will remain outside the risk-based framework for now and will continue to pay the card rate of 12 paise, citing data limitations. Together, these banks account for less than 1% of the total deposit insurance premium collected.
 
In a notable feature, the framework also introduces a 'vintage' incentive to reward banks with a long history of stable operations. For eligible banks, this incentive can reduce premiums further by 1% for every completed year of satisfactory conduct, subject to a maximum discount of 25%.
 
For tier-1 banks, the incentive applies if the bank has not faced restructuring or major distress events. For tier-2 institutions, including rural and cooperative banks, a flat 25% incentive is available to those that have completed 25 years without significant stress.
 
However, banks that are currently under RBI’s supervisory action framework or prompt corrective action will not qualify for lower premiums and will continue to pay the full rate until they exit these restrictions.
 
While banks will be informed of their risk category, RBI and DICGC have made it clear that these ratings will remain strictly confidential. Banks are barred from disclosing their ratings or using them for marketing or business solicitation. Any violation could invite regulatory or penal action.
 
DICGC also retains the right to override a bank’s rating if new adverse information comes to light, ensuring that premiums reflect real-time risk conditions rather than static assessments.
 
Another notable change relates to disclosure norms. Banks will no longer be required to disclose the exact amount of deposit insurance premium paid in their financial statements. Instead, they will simply state that the premium was paid within prescribed timelines, with delays, if any, being disclosed separately.
 
The shift to risk-based pricing aligns India’s deposit insurance framework more closely with global best practices, where stronger institutions are not forced to subsidise weaker ones indefinitely. It also strengthens market discipline by linking insurance costs to risk-taking behaviour.
 
The decision follows RBI’s announcement in its statement on developmental and regulatory policies in October 2025 and was approved by RBI’s central board in December 2025.
 
The risk-based premium system will be reviewed at least once every three years, allowing regulators to fine-tune the methodology as the banking system evolves.
 
With implementation set for April 2026, banks now have just over a year to assess how their risk profiles and governance standards could affect their insurance costs in the new regime.
Comments
yerramr
1 month ago
Banks should review risk-based framework once every year and not three years.
abhay1955
1 month ago
A good step. But I am surprised that I will never come to know how much premium my bank will be paying ! One more feather in the cap of RBI to hide information. Again, even if the premium structure is getting changed, the insurance cover remains the same, Rs.5 lakhs, when banks are paying premium on the entire deposits. It would also be interesting to see the effect on ROI on deposits.
SEBI Bars Madhav Tiwari of Divinecommodity.co from Markets, Orders Refund of ₹1.70 Crore to Investors
Moneylife Digital Team 09 February 2026
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has barred Madhav Tiwari, the proprietor of Divinecommodity.co, from accessing the securities market and directed him to refund ₹1.70 crore collected from clients and...
NCLT Admits Rare Class Action Lawsuit against Jindal Poly Films: A Landmark Case for Minority Shareholder Rights in India
Moneylife Digital Team 06 February 2026
In a significant development for corporate governance and minority shareholder rights in India, the national company law tribunal (NCLT) has admitted a class-action lawsuit filed by minority shareholders of Jindal Poly Films, seeking...
RBI Imposes Over ₹4 Lakh Penalty on 3 Cooperative Banks for Regulatory Lapses
Moneylife Digital Team 06 February 2026
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a total penalty of ₹4.05 lakh on three cooperative banks for non-compliance with its regulatory directions. The highest penalty of ₹2 lakh has been imposed on Odisha-based Jeypore Cooperative...
Setco Automotive’s Promoters, Directors Face ₹28 lakh Penalties and Market Ban
Moneylife Digital Team 06 February 2026
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has barred promoters and key managerial personnel of Setco Automotive Ltd (SAL) markets for up to two years citing large-scale diversion and mis-utilisation of company...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback