At an event in Mumbai on Wednesday, SEBI chief UK Sinha indirectly pointed out the games Sahara has been playing about repaying the money as per a Supreme Court order. Today, in an open attack on SEBI chairman, Sahara put out a press release saying that “rich men’s SEBI do not understand, recognise poor Investors”.
Yesterday at an event at Indian Merchants’ Chamber of Commerce in Mumbai, SEBI chairman UK Sinha pointed out the menace of Collective Investment Schemes which are thumbing their nose at the market regulator. In a veiled attacked on Sahara, he pointed out: “There is a famous instance where a company has claimed that it has refunded more than Rs20,000 crore in the last three to four months to so-called investors out of which more than 90% cent has been returned in cash. How feasible and credible can this story be?” Sinha wondered.
While Sinha did not name Sahara (neither did most newspapers who are large beneficiaries of Sahara advertisements), in a strongly worded press release issued today, Sahara attacked the SEBI chief.
Here is the text of the unedited press release in all its glory. Please savour it.
“Sahara complained that SEBI Chairman Sri U.K. Sinha neither gave time to meet our Chairman since last one year nor he accepted the invitation for appearing with our Chairman in T.V. Channel for informing people the truth and torture given to Sahara. Such a big responsible person should not give irresponsible statements that how and why Rs.20,000 crores repayments were made in 4 months and 90% was paid in cash. Well, he should have asked these questions to Sahara first.
Repeatedly we have written to SEBI and everywhere that our investors are very small and mostly living in small townships and rural areas. These investors do not go to Banks and Banks do not come to them.
Our investors profile on the basis of principal amount.
Upto Rs. 5, 000/- = 1.33 crores, upto Rs.10,000/- another 0.88 crores, upto Rs.15,000/- another 0.42 crores, upto Rs.20,000/- another 0.36 crores. This totals to 2.99 crores out of total investors of 3.07 crores. We genuinely hope that the SEBI Chairman should kindly send an amended statement to Media with realisation and apologies that why cash repayments to around 90% investors have been made and the 90% cash payments are totally justified.
Upto Rs. 20,000 repayments (including interest) it is cash payments only as per country’s law.
It should also be clear that 90% amount of investors in both the companies have come from investors upto Rs.20, 000 that is 2.99 Crores. So any logical but unbiased mind shall be convinced, accept and understand our challenge in the past also that there cannot be any case of fictitious, fake investors in Sahara.
He has also mentioned about paying Rs. 20,000 crores in 4 months. But majority payments are in 5 months plus time.
SEBI knows the reason very well that upto April 2012, esteemed investors through our committed and highly concerned field workers in Lakhs, knew that Hon’ble Supreme Court is likely to give 5 – 6 years against security of properties. We have submitted the valuation reports of properties to Hon’ble Supreme Court.
In fact in case of RNBC under regulation of Reserve Bank in 2008, RBI had given 7 years time to repay. This 7 years time was given within 10 days from the date of Prohibitory Order. So there was no chance, no reason of big rush demands of any nature.
Again the same profile of investors in RNBC also that is deposit of around Rs.20,000 crores with 3 crores plus investors. Important to note that we had almost repaid all liabilities 3 years in advance in RNBC.
But all of sudden in May 2012, 1st Week, Hon’ble Supreme Court ordered for continuous hearing in June 2012 and decision had to be given the same time.
During April 2012, one news was probably infected by some interested party which spread like wild fire in our field, Countrywide that in case of Golden Forest Company which was exactly similarly initiated and fought by SEBI. After Hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision in 2004 in this Golden Forest Company for repayment, not a single rupee has been paid to any investors till today that is in 8 – 9 years. Workers and Investors also knew that there were dozens of other Companies where, SEBI’s had taken action but not a single investor have received one rupee till now.
Also, company as sole custodian of Investors money from last 34 years got concerned about Esteemed very small investors.
Then there was big rush with demands for repayments. There were big – big queues in front of offices throughout the country. We had to repay big sum but could contain to a great extent the rush by around middle of June. So almost 60% repayments had to be done in around 45 days only. Really a very difficult time for Sahara for no fault of ours.
No fault of ours since we did this OFCD business after we got all valid permissions in writing from Central Government through Ministry of Corporate affairs as our regulator who continuously used to inspect and investigate, all Balance Sheets etc. were regularly to be submitted to them etc. etc. for last 10 – 11 years as our regulator but we faced and are facing very difficult days with retrospective effect punishments. Government departments who gave us written permission are not accused at all. Had they not given these permissions we would not have collected even one rupee and we would not have faced any problem. Well we are Prajas and they are Rajas.
One thing SEBI should understand that, had there been any hanky – panky by Sahara as accused by Chairman SEBI, then why we could not manage 5000 Crore which we have paid to SEBI.
Humble request to SEBI to act Judiciously like a very responsible and very big Regulator as big brother of society.
Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam

Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.

Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.

Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )

qte
EoW Probe Into Sahara-Sebi Row
Abhijit.Sathe @timesgroup.com
The running battle between Sahara India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India over the Rs 24,000 crore the company has been ordered to refund to its investors has now reached the Mumbai police’s doors.
The Economic Offences Wing of the Mumbai Crime Branch has launched a preliminary inquiry against Sahara following a complaint from Sebi that the company is intimidating the investors. Sahara chief Subrata Roy and other top executives, meanwhile, have been summoned for personal appearance before Sebi on Wednesday in the high-profile case involving an estimated 3 crore investors.
Late on Tuesday night, Additional Commissioner of Police Rajvardhan refused to discuss any specifics of Sebi’s complaint. “We have been asked by the Government of India to investigate the case. We have initiated a preliminary investigation. No complaint has been filed yet.”
The Sahara group was asked by the Supreme Court in August last year to repay deposits raised by “dubious” means from nearly 3 crore small investors.
unqte
Lage rahgo! gol sab ko ghumato raho!
The reason for SEBI now to go after Sahara is not a unique and this even the Peon in my office knows that Sahara's biggest supporter is SP and all the black money of SP etc is routed through Sahara to laundered. The current equation between SP and UPA all knows, so SEBI is a tool to keep check on Sahara which in turn will keep check UPA’s support.
This is all political game and fully scripted by the masters of UPA so that scrutiny etc will be in 2012, 2013 which will keep SP in check.
Even the media knows this very well, but due to whatever reason this link will not be out and expose.
Mr. Sinha is no Political or Public leader who has to take recourse to Public meetings or utterances. He has enough authority of his own to ask these questions directly to Sahara.
You wanted to know more about U K Sinha. Arun Agrawal from Bangalore has written extensively on it. Here is the link: http://canarytrap.in/2012/09/27/download...
Trust it whets your appetite.
==============================
Time has come that India would be compelled to recognise the talent of Sahara Shri Subroto Roy. UIDAI may be scrapped, Nandan Nilkeni sent packing home, and the Direct Benefit Transfer Scheme should be handed over to Sahara India for flawless and efficient execution without GOI having to pay extravagantly for hardware and software infrastructure as well as costly software glitches in actual operations. This would achieve another very important objective, that of Inclusive Development. Instead of paying huge amounts to fabulously rich IT and BPO companies, the average, poor, mofussil Indian would get an opportunity to improve his earnings and life. Come elections in 2014, and this army of dedicated and ubiquitous Sahara workers would ensure victory of any ruling dispensation.
_______________________
Roy is simply asking, has anybody complained to anybody that Sahara India Group has duped her? No! Then, where is the case of malfeasance made out against Sahara? No one has complained because may be no one has invested in Sahara India companies. That is, there are no genuine small small investors as claimed by Sahara is what Supreme Court seems to suspect. If there are no genuine investors, then where has the money come from. The responsibility for allaying these suspicions is squarely on Sahara India and Sahara Shri Subroto Roy. Until this is done, its operations run the risk of being viewed as the biggest money laundering service operating in the country. Investigating agencies tasked with nailing Economic offenses have their work cut out for them. Unfortunately for them, this one doesn't promise any foreign junkets. Who stops them from biting the bullet?
___________________________
For more visit:
1] http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
2]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
3]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
4]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
5]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
You wanted to know more about U K Sinha. Arun Agrawal from Bangalore has written extensively on it. Here is the link: http://canarytrap.in/2012/09/27/download...
Trust it whets your appetite.
==============================
Time has come that India would be compelled to recognise the talent of Sahara Shri Subroto Roy. UIDAI may be scrapped, Nandan Nilkeni sent packing home, and the Direct Benefit Transfer Scheme should be handed over to Sahara India for flawless and efficient execution without GOI having to pay extravagantly for hardware and software infrastructure as well as costly software glitches in actual operations. This would achieve another very important objective, that of Inclusive Development. Instead of paying huge amounts to fabulously rich IT and BPO companies, the average, poor, mofussil Indian would get an opportunity to improve his earnings and life. Come elections in 2014, and this army of dedicated and ubiquitous Sahara workers would ensure victory of any ruling dispensation.
_______________________
Roy is simply asking, has anybody complained to anybody that Sahara India Group has duped her? No! Then, where is the case of malfeasance made out against Sahara? No one has complained because may be no one has invested in Sahara India companies. That is, there are no genuine small small investors as claimed by Sahara is what Supreme Court seems to suspect. If there are no genuine investors, then where has the money come from. The responsibility for allaying these suspicions is squarely on Sahara India and Sahara Shri Subroto Roy. Until this is done, its operations run the risk of being viewed as the biggest money laundering service operating in the country. Investigating agencies tasked with nailing Economic offenses have their work cut out for them. Unfortunately for them, this one doesn't promise any foreign junkets. Who stops them from biting the bullet?
___________________________
For more visit:
1] http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
2]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
3]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
4]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
5]http://searchlight-is-on.blogspot.in/201...
SEBI has destroyed the entire CAPITAL Market, which includes Mutual Funds & all other investment plans by their whimsical rules & regulations. They never understand the problems of the poor and small investors. They set the rules for the industry and if any thing goes wrong, they do not take the blame on them. They start blaming others as fraudsters.