Mukesh Ambani-led RIL has served legal notice to Moneylife for allegedly lowering the prestige of Reliance Industries among the conglomerate's friends and well-wishers
Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has served a legal notice on Debashis Basu, editor and publisher of Moneylife, Moneywise Media Pvt Ltd and Sucheta Dalal, managing editor of Moneylife, for publishing articles "Congress gift to Reliance: RIL sole beneficiary of anti-dumping duty on PTA" () and "Ambani ki dukaan?"
The notice, sent by legal services firm Khaitan & Co also accuse Moneylife of "lowering the prestige of RIL among the conglomerate's friends and well-wishers".
The notice, while referring Ms Dalal, the managing editor of Moneylife as 'reporter', accuses her of "validating highly objectionable parts from the book "Gas Wars - Crony Capitalism and the Ambanis" in her article 'Ambani ki dukaan?'. Interestingly, the notice referes to the book as 'Pamphlet' at all places, including notices sent to the writers and publishers of the book.
"...you have entered into a deliberate attempt to slander our client's name and reputation by publicizing a highly-objectionable Pamphlet titled "Gas Wars - Crony Capitalism and the Ambani's dukan" by one Paranjoy Guha Thakurta alongwith Subir Ghosh and Jyotirmoy Chaudhuri written, published and distributed with the explicit purpose of making slanderous and baseless allegations against our client (Pamphlet) by validating its highly-objectionable parts in your piece 'Ambani ki dukaan?' on 14 April 2014 at 4.01pm and repeated the injury to our client in the 1 May 2014 edition of Moneylife on pages 16 and 17. In this article you have mixed the wholly unrelated issue of PTA described in para 1-15 of this legal notice with the machinations and the slander inherent in the said Pamphlet. Our clients reserve the right to include for colluding with the said authors of the Pamphlet for the same as the distributor of their canards," the notice from Khaitan & Co says.
Last week, the same lawyer firm issued notices to the authors and distributors of the book "Gas Wars - Crony Capitalism and the Ambanis". The notices also accuse e-distributors of the book, Authors Upfront and Feel Books Pvt Ltd as well as Flipkart and Amazon of being party to a "common conspiracy" to "ensure the defamation of our clients for personal gains". Also included among those served notice is Deepshikha Shankar, event manager for the Foundation of Media Professionals, who had in her personal capacity forwarded the e-invite for the book release function to several people, says a report from Times of India.
Over the past two years, Reliance has been the target of attacks by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan, but they have never been served any legal notice.
In fact, TV news channels, owned by the RIL group itself broadcast the press conferences of Kejriwal and Bhushan LIVE several times, in which the latter have made serious allegations about Reliance. “I find it quite perplexing. If you felt that you have been defamed by what Prashant Bhushan and I said, then we are the real culprits and, if you had to send a defamation notice, it should have been to us. The TV channels merely broadcast what we said,” Kejriwal was quoted as saying in a English translation of the letter posted on the AAP website. Its not clear whether large media groups like TV18, in which RIL has substantial interest, have also received any such notice, since their TV channels had also carried the press conferences of Kejriwal.
Earlier in February this year, Kejriwal, while speaking at a rally, repeatedly cited two bank account numbers claiming that they belonged to Ambani brothers, Mukesh and Anil. This was done as part of challenging Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi to get black money back from Swiss banks.
However, all the Mukesh Ambani-led conglomerate did was issue a press release refuting the allegations made by Kejriwal, blaming it on mythical ‘vested interests’. "It is being reiterated that neither Reliance Industries nor Mr Mukesh Ambani have or had any illegitimate accounts anywhere in the world. The continued tirade of baseless allegations being made by AAP against us appears to be instigated by vested interests," the company had said. (Reliance refutes Kejriwal's allegations terming it as 'baseless')
Seperately, EAS Sarma, former secretary of the Government of India (GoI), had demanded an independent investigation into the whole gamut of showering one largesse after another on RIL that would unravel the hidden links in this web of improprieties. (Set up SIT to investigate showering of one largesse after another on RIL, says Sarma )
The former secretary had written several letters to the PM and petroleum ministry on the improprieties committed by the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in dealing with RIL’s gas project in Krishna Godavari (KG) Basin in Andhra Pradesh.
Last week, Gopalkrishna Gandhi, former governor of West Bengal, called Reliance Industries as 'parallel state', which exercised power brazenly over natural and financial resources, says a report from Times of India. Quoting Mr Gandhi, the report says, "We used to talk of black money as a parallel economy and so it continues to be. But Reliance is a parallel State. I do not know of any country where one single firm exercises such power so brazenly, over the natural resources, financial resources, professional resources and, ultimately, over human resources as the company of the Ambanis". The former governor was speaking at the 15th DP Kohli Memorial Lecture that had over 3,000 officials from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the audience.
From what we know, none of these parties have been served legal notice by Reliance Industries.
Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )
Your predictions regarding Mukesh Ambani trying to control Indian media unfortunately came true. We Indians more than ever need Debashis Basu, editor, publisher of Moneylife, Moneywise Media Pvt Ltd and Sucheta Dalal and its dedicated and fearless employees.
An idea:
if you can please do video reporting over some special topics like "Indian media Freedom: The end is near?", "Indian pollution and heath: grave danger" , "Indian culture or Bad people: who is responsible for rapes" etc.
Does the notice to Authors also uses the word Pamphlet?
"India has an array of politicians, statesmen, businessmen and bureaucrats who do not face corruption charges. These eminent individuals have a moral responsibility to help the country pull out of the present crisis. UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had exhorted for ‘zero tolerance’ to corruption while addressing congressmen in Allahabad sometime back. Her vision did not find takers even among her followers inasmuch as the government guided by her failed to take steps to ensure that at least people facing huge corruption charges did not hold public offices. While convalescing in the United States last year, Sonia Gandhi once again remembered the need to tackle corruption and on return to India promptly requested her party to do something about it.
Going by dictionary meaning, the word corruption is associated with words like bribe, cheating, evil, badness, decayed, stinking, decayed, false, defilement, wickedness, violation, defective, spoilt, faulty, wrong, malignant, offensive, immoral, unchaste, vile and fallen (the list can go on). Suffice to say, anyone or any institution/organization having something attributable to any formations out of any of these words can be alleged to be corrupt. Luckily not so. It is generally accepted that what is legal is not corrupt. Then, like morality, the perception of corruption varies from individual to individual, society to society and country to country. Meaning, what is construed as legal in one context need not be so in another context.
For the rich and the powerful, there will always be legal remedies, as, historically, the laws are made and interpreted in their favor. No wonder, while really corrupt people take shelter under legal interpretations and the age-old protection available to those facing allegations to the effect that until proved guilty, the benefit of doubt would go in favor of the accused, eminent statesmen and innocent common man get dragged into controversies related to corruption, day in and day out, despite their efforts to maintain high moral and ethical standards in their own lives. In the deluge of corruption that the world is witnessing today, no Krishna will be able to float on a leaf unaffected by the deluge. The value system which is in disrepair globally needs a shock treatment. The initiative can come from India, if the nation decides to make every embarrassment an opportunity to correct and move forward. This can be done only by handling individual corruption cases on the basis of the facts of the case and not with reference to the impact such action will have on coalition government’s equilibrium or the immediate inconvenience or discomfort some individuals will face."
.
What use are 2 Judges together – IF both are having extremely low IQ level ? – Just one with human intelligence would be better
http://ikchhugani.wordpress.com/?p=8
.
What use are 2 Judges together – IF both are having extremely low IQ level ? – Just one with human intelligence would be better
http://ikchhugani.wordpress.com/?p=8
Dolphy