Pakistan’s ‘Wrong’ Path
I keep hearing: ‘Pakistan adopted the wrong path. Look at India.’
Pakistanis say it sadly, Indians say it gloatingly.
May I respectfully submit—both are wrong.
Pakistan is 100% on the right path, which it has successfully pursued for over 50 years. 
No, I don’t mean anything nasty, like ‘path of self-destruction’. 
But first, let me ask—what is Pakistan? A country, right?
Pakistan is a corporation, owned and run by an owner-management group—the ‘establishment’, “E” for short.
As you know, the purpose of a corporation is ‘to maximise the wealth of its shareholders’. Its management’s task is to achieve this purpose.
In Pakistan, E controls every important area—foreign policy, economy, and even court decisions. It also owns a good chunk of the country’s assets through Fauji Foundation. In effect, E owns and manages Pakistan.
E consists of the dozen or so ‘key decision-makers in the country's military and intelligence services’ (courtesy—Wikipedia). It is aided by around 100+ other people – second-rank generals, plus those who really matter in bureaucracy, politics, and business. They are paid handsomely to do one key job - control the people below them.
E, as an entity, did not exist when Pakistan was created 76 years ago, because nobody, starting with Muhammad Ali Jinnah, had really any clue about what Pakistan was all about. Only one thing was clear – it was not India.
It was this ‘vision’, or rather, the lack of it, that set Pakistan on an uncertain path after Mr Jinnah died. A chaotic power grab started, prime ministers came and went, and nobody was quite sure who was in charge.
The army stepped in.
General Ayub Khan, a first-rate opportunist if ever there was one, grabbed power through Pakistan’s first military coup and installed himself as president.  
That was the birth of E.
Things were going quite well at first. Gen Khan became a paltu of Uncle Sam, received largesse, by way of both cash and arms, and E prospered. 
Then came E’s first big blunder.
It saw India to be an impoverished nation, dependent on PL-480 for food, with a weak army that recently fought a war with China. Pakistan had Patton tanks, Sabre jets and American backing. Gen Khan launched Operation Gibraltar, which flopped.
The 1965 misadventure was followed by the second blunder which led to the debacle of 1971. E was publicly humiliated and half the country was gone.
E lay low for a few years until Gen Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq revived it. He found the right formula – the path to success. 
It had two principles:
- Keep the country going, as long as possible, and go on making money.
- Keep the public sedated with two opiates: religion and hatred of India.
E collected money from whomever or wherever it could, e.g.,:
- International Monetary Fund (IMF), 22 times;
- US, during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and then during the ‘war on terror’;
- China, via China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and by
- mortgaging fixed assets – ports, airports, highways.
The amounts involved are humongous. A small slice, say just 10%, from every such funding would add up to tens of billions. Just 1% from the economy would be more than US$2bn (billion) a year.
The members of E share this money among themselves. Evidence of this is plentiful. Gen Bajwa gave his future daughter-in-law Rs100 crore at the engagement. The ‘junior’ Bajwa – a retired Lt Gen, owns the Papa John pizza chain. Need I say more?
There is an established system of batwara whereby every senior general gets his cut so that he can stash enough wealth abroad for his future generations.
Yes, E has been on the right path for over 50 years.
Cut to the present.
The country is bankrupt, people are revolting, provinces are threatening to secede, the Taliban is attacking on one side, and India looms on the other...
What does E do now?
There is no fear of any personal harm befalling the members of E. For them, “bags are packed and ready to go, taxi is waiting at the door.” If things go badly wrong, they will board their respective getaway airplanes and fly to their new lives already set up abroad.
But, that is the final fallback option, the 'retreat'.
The objective continues to be—keep the system going and continue making money. 
How to achieve this?
There are several cards left to play.
1. The suicide card. Announce to the world that unless substantial help comes, right now, the country will collapse, civil war will start, and atom bombs will fall into the wrong hands—in short, Armageddon. Can the world allow this to happen?
2. The asset card. Sell more assets—Gwadar and parts of Gilgit to China, remaining utilities and businesses to the Arabs. A good chunk of money can still be made from the usual cuts.
3. The atom bomb card. Sell the atom bombs to the highest bidders, not just one bidder. Some can go to Uncle Sam, others (very quietly) to ISIS and its kin. No dearth of takers for 150 bombs, I would think.
4. The MBS card. Round up all the rich, non-military chaps (businessmen, bureaucrats, politicians, and judges), put them in a hotel, and ‘gently’ persuade them to ‘contribute’ a portion of their wealth for bailing out their country.
5. The India card. Hand over the likes of Hafeez-bhai, Dawood-saab, etc, promise to stop terrorism and beg for money and help.
Maybe there are more options—I don’t know.
Some of them, especially No. 5, will be unpalatable to the members of E. But remember, their pockets are already full; hence, they can afford to have egos.
But what about the ‘ladies-in-waiting’, the next echelon of generals, who have been doing the “yes sir, no sir” routine for 30 years, hoping to make it to E-status? They don’t want the system to collapse.
Bottom line—E had better make up its mind about which option(s) to choose to keep the show going, or there could be a coup d'état. The E-graders may find themselves in their getaway planes, in prison, or simply dead.
Interesting times next door, not just here (Bharat vs I.N.D.I.A.).
(Deserting engineering after a year in a factory, Amitabha Banerjee did an MBA in the US and returned to India. Choosing work-to-live over live-to-work, he joined banking and worked for various banks in India and the Middle East. Post-retirement, he returned to his hometown Kolkata and is now spending his golden years travelling the world, playing bridge, befriending Netflix & Prime Video and writing in his wife’s travel blog.)
9 months ago
India is not far behind, just under guise of democracy, there is undeclared autocracy. The party in power has grabbed so much power by naming its own cronies at the posts that matter, that it is going to be really difficult to dislodge it.
Replied to silloomarker comment 9 months ago
Single party government after thirty years has given the present government the space to implement its manifesto decisively without consulting opposition or appeasing media. This very fact is decried by people like you to be autocracy.
Meenal Mamdani
Replied to pankajpandya58 comment 9 months ago
That is autocracy when a political party thinks that it has the right to impose its views on all citizens.
BJP, at its best, has never won more than 1/3rd of the votes cast, so to think that it has the right to impose its views on the remaining 2/3rd of voters, is hubris unparalleled.
Moreover, BJP is using the instruments of the State, ED, CBI, etc to harass the opposition which is illegal and despicable.
Neither BJP, nor any other political party has the right to impose its ideology on the machinery of the State.
Rule of law must be above politics and that has been destroyed by the BJP for its own political ends.
The only difference between BJP and a dictatorship is that we still have an independent Judiciary and the army is not under the control of the BJP.
If BJP loses its seat count in the 2024 Loksabha elections, will it use the military to entrench itself in power?
I am not sure.
9 months ago
Moment religion as an opiate is used, implies there are E’s administering to gain wealth. One can see in many countries. That is how communism was born
9 months ago
As the Pakistani poet gloats...India..Tum Bhi Tho Hum Jaise Niklay ?
Meenal Mamdani
9 months ago
Your tongue-in-cheek descriptions of the corruption in Pakistan where the main actors are the military is very apt.
You should start composing another article for the next MLF newsletter.
This time you should describe how a certain political party in India has captured the state and it's crony capitalist is buying up large swathes of Indian enterprises with no oversight by the regulator.
The regulator, whose top ex-official has been appointed to a lucrative position in an entity owned by the same crony capitalist, has also been captured.
In fact, the current head of RBI was also hand-picked by the same political entity.
So, unlike Pakistan, the army is not involved.
But for how long?
Will it be called in to prop up those in power after the outcome of elections in 2024?
Free Helpline
Legal Credit