NFRA Inspection Flags Deficiencies in Deloitte Haskins & Sells' Audit Processes
Moneylife Digital Team 01 April 2025
The national financial reporting authority (NFRA) has released an inspection report highlighting significant deficiencies in the audit processes of Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP (Deloitte). The report, issued on 28 March 2025, scrutinises Deloitte's compliance with auditing and accounting standards, revealing key areas of concern.
 
NFRA's investigation uncovered several inconsistencies in Deloitte's audit approach, particularly in its adherence to regulatory and quality control standards. The inspection was conducted as part of an ongoing effort to improve audit quality and ensure regulatory compliance.
 
Some of the major observations by NFRA included:
Inadequate documentation: Deloitte reportedly failed to maintain sufficient audit documentation, impacting the transparency and reliability of its audits.
 
Deficient risk assessment: There were shortcomings in the identification and assessment of material misstatements, leading to potential inaccuracies in financial reporting.
 
Non-compliance with auditing standards: Deloitte was found to have deviated from key regulatory requirements, raising concerns about the firm's compliance framework.
 
Weak verification of related party transactions: The audit firm did not conduct sufficient and appropriate audit procedures to verify related party transactions on an arm's length basis.
 
Lack of auditor competence & scepticism: The review highlighted inadequate evaluation of competence, capability, and objectivity of the auditor's expert, as per SA 620 standards.
 
Remedial measures and Deloitte's response
NFRA says, as per its observations, Deloitte implemented procedural changes to strengthen quality control and risk management. It included the adoption of a revised networking agreement, with the audit executive committee assuming full responsibility, integration of engagement quality control review (EQCR) documentation within audit files, ensuring better transparency in decision-making and voluntary adoption of non-audit service (NAS) guidelines to avoid conflicts of interest. 
 
However, NFRA says it expects full compliance by Deloitte with section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013.
 
The deficiencies highlighted in Deloitte's processes could lead to further regulatory scrutiny and potential corrective measures from the firm.
 
Industry experts believe that such inspections play a crucial role in maintaining investor confidence and upholding the credibility of financial statements. As one of the leading audit firms in India, Deloitte's operations significantly influence corporate governance and financial reporting standards.
Comments
parimalshah1
2 weeks ago
Most auditors are hand in gloves in corporations that do frauds. The auditors themselves often show the way to game the system and syphon off the money or worse.
rustagisk1958
2 weeks ago
The Standard of Audit published by ICAI is the mother documents which an Auditor must comply while doing the audit . Following is the simple process to follow in case of Mis Statement.
Here's an overview of the audit procedures to be followed when a misstatement is detected during an audit under the ICAI framework:

Initial Response (SA 240)
1. *Evaluate the Misstatement*: Assess the materiality and nature of the misstatement.
2. *Discuss with Management*: Inform and discuss the misstatement with management.
3. *Obtain Management's Response*: Document management's response, including their explanation and proposed corrective actions.

Audit Procedures (SA 240, SA 330, and SA 450)
1. *Re-evaluate Risk Assessment*: Update the risk assessment to reflect the misstatement.
2. *Perform Additional Procedures*: Design and perform additional audit procedures to:
- Verify the accuracy of financial statements.
- Test the operating effectiveness of internal controls.
- Evaluate the reasonableness of management's estimates and judgments.
3. *Consider the Impact on Other Areas*: Assess the potential impact of the misstatement on other areas of the financial statements.
4. *Evaluate the Need for Expert Assistance*: Consider seeking expert assistance, such as a forensic accountant or a specialist in the relevant area.

Communication with Management and Those Charged with Governance (SA 260 and SA 265)
1. *Communicate the Misstatement*: Inform management and those charged with governance about the misstatement and its implications.
2. *Discuss the Proposed Corrective Actions*: Discuss and agree upon the proposed corrective actions with management.
3. *Consider the Need for Disclosure*: Evaluate the need for disclosure of the misstatement in the financial statements.

Reporting Considerations (SA 700 and SA 705)
1. *Evaluate the Impact on the Audit Report*: Consider the impact of the misstatement on the audit report, including the need for an emphasis of matter or a qualified opinion.
2. *Document the Misstatement and Corrective Actions*: Document the misstatement, the proposed corrective actions, and the auditor's response in the audit working papers.

Quality Control and Review (SA 220)
1. *Conduct a Review*: Perform a review of the audit procedures and conclusions to ensure that the misstatement was properly addressed.
2. *Document the Review*: Document the review procedures and conclusions in the audit working papers.


josephpv06
3 weeks ago
The CA profession is at a low. CAs are being churned out like a production line, but the depth of knowledge and the credibility, accountability and transparency are found wanting, when compared to the profession in the 70s and 80s. No wonder NFRA had to be formed to oversee the ICAI Members. Isnt that a matter of shame that the topmost accounting and audit body in the country is subject to scrutiny !! I dont think the ACS and ICMA members are under control of any regulatory body. Wuite a reflection on this profession.
Kamal Garg
Replied to josephpv06 comment 2 weeks ago
Agreed. Ever since, the pass-out percentage of CA exam has increased drastically in the last 20-30 years, the quality of the pass-outs and the profession has gone down considerably. It is definitely a matter of shame that the Govt had to think of creating an upper and over-arching body like NFRA to regulate ICAI.
Dabur To Withdraw ‘Anti-bacterial’ Claims from Toothpaste Labels
Sahyaja MS (Bar  and  Bench) 31 March 2025
Dabur India Ltd has told the Bombay High Court that it will withdraw terms like "anti-inflammatory," "anti-bacterial," and "analgesic" from the labels of its two toothpaste products, Dabur Meswak Toothpaste and Dabur Herb1...
RBI Slaps Rs1.16 Crore Penalty on 9 Coop Banks, 3 NBFCs, 2 HFCs and 1 ARC
Moneylife Digital Team 31 March 2025
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed penalties of Rs1.16 crore on 15 financial institutions, including nine cooperative Banks, three non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), two housing finance companies (HFCs) and one asset...
Abhipra Capital Fined Rs8 Lakh for Misusing Client Funds & Regulatory Breaches
Moneylife Digital Team 31 March 2025
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed a penalty of Rs8 lakh on Abhipra Capital Ltd (ACL), a stockbroker, for misusing client funds and multiple regulatory violations. A comprehensive joint...
Money Bells Global Research Services Penalised Rs7 Lakh for Regulatory Violations
Moneylife Digital Team 31 March 2025
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has fined Money Bells Global Research Services Pvt Ltd Rs7 lakh for violating multiple regulations. The company, a registered research analyst (RA), was found guilty of...
Array
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback