Mumbai Press Club Condemns Maharashtra Govt’s Media Monitoring Initiative
Moneylife Digital Team 10 March 2025
The Mumbai Press Club has strongly criticised the Maharashtra government’s decision to establish a media monitoring centre, calling it an act of surveillance disguised as an effort to curb misinformation. The move, which aims to track news coverage across print, television, digital and social media, has raised concerns about press freedom and governmental overreach.
 
According to a government resolution (GR) outlining the initiative, the centre will categorise news content as ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ concerning the government. The Mumbai Press Club warns that such a classification system, lacking clear definitions, poses a significant risk of conflating legitimate criticism with misinformation.
 
“This initiative effectively grants the government the power to determine what constitutes positive and negative reporting,” the Mumbai Press Club stated. “There is a real danger that any form of critique will be labelled as negative, thereby stifling journalistic independence.”
 
Critics argue that this could lead to profiling and targeting of media outlets or journalists who express dissenting views. The Press Club emphasised that such measures act as an indirect warning to media organisations, discouraging them from publishing stories that may be deemed unfavourable by the administration.
 
A major concern highlighted by the Mumbai Press Club is the government’s assumption of the role of sole arbiter of truth. Drawing parallels with the union government’s previous attempt to establish a fact-checking unit (FCU) to identify ‘fake and false’ content on social media—an initiative recently struck down by the Bombay High Court —the press club reiterated the judiciary’s stance that such policies infringe upon freedom of speech and create a ‘chilling effect’ amounting to censorship.
 
“When a significant portion of news coverage revolves around the government and its policies, allowing the administration to dictate what is truthful and what is not represents a clear conflict of interest,” the statement continued. “Instead of imposing its own narrative, the government must have the courage to confront inconvenient truths.”
 
The Maharashtra government has yet to respond to the backlash, but media professionals and civil rights activists have joined the call to reassess the monitoring centre’s mandate. The Mumbai Press Club insists that upholding press freedom is essential for democracy and urges the government to reconsider its approach to media oversight.
 
Comments
How & Why Advocating an 80-90 Hour Week Is Abetting Multiple Offences
KBS Sidhu 07 March 2025
Amitabh Kant, former chief executive officer (CEO) of NITI Aayog and India’s G20 Sherpa, recently suggested that Indians should work 80-90 hours a week to propel the country toward a US$30 trillion economy. This remark follows closely...
Supreme Court Allows Pune Eatery To Use Burger King for Now
SN Thyagarajan (Bar  and  Bench) 07 March 2025
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a recent order of the Bombay High Court restraining a Pune-based restaurant from using the name 'Burger King'. (Anahita Irani v. Burger King.)
 
The stay means that the Pune eatery can continue to...
Lessons from the Past 123: The Foundation of a Country!
Walter Vieira, 07 March 2025
Nearly 25 years ago, I was complaining to the late FC Kohli, a pioneer who put India on the software map of the world; and was vice-chairman of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), about the lack of social skills among many of our people...
Shocking: Supreme Court Slams UP for Demolition of House of Lawyer, Professor
Debayan Roy (Bar  and  Bench) 06 March 2025
The Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Uttar Pradesh government for demolishing the houses of a lawyer, a professor and three others in Prayagraj without following the procedure under law.
 
The Bench of Justices Abhay S Oka...
Array
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback