Moneylife Impact: GST on Penal Charges Out; Refunds Must Follow
Moneylife Digital Team 27 December 2024
In a significant decision, the GST council clarified during its 55th meeting on 21 December 2024, that penal charges imposed by banks and financial institutions will no longer attract goods and services tax (GST). This clarification has resolved months of confusion that arose when banks began levying 18% GST on penal charges from April, 2024. Moneylife had highlighted the scale of the problem earlier this year, in an article authored by Chandramouli Mohan, a retired banker (Read: Borrowers Reeling from 18% GST on Penal Charges Approved by RBI on Late Payment
 
The council clarified that penal charges are compensatory in nature and do not qualify as a 'supply of services' under GST laws, effectively exempting them from GST. While this decision offers relief, it also raises important questions about the refund of GST collected over the past several months, an amount that could run into several hundred crores rupees.
 
Penal charges are intended to deter non-compliance, such as delays in loan repayments or failure to submit financial documents. Unlike regular fees, these charges are not payments for a service rendered but penalties for breaching terms. Therefore, as pointed out by Chandramouli Mohan in his article, penal charges do not meet the definition of taxable services under GST laws and should never have attracted GST.
 
In August 2023, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) introduced guidelines to replace penal interest with penal charges to ensure fairness and transparency. However, this transition inadvertently brought penal charges under the GST ambit, adding an 18% tax to penalties already borne by financially strained borrowers.
 
For instance, a borrower previously paying Rs1,000 in penal interest would now pay Rs1,180 under the new system. Many banks compounded this issue by applying the charges to the total outstanding amount rather than the specific overdue amount, further increasing the financial burden.
 
The introduction of GST on penal charges created ambiguity, as these charges are compensatory rather than service-oriented, do not align with the principles of taxable services. The lack of clear guidance from RBI and tax authorities exacerbated the problem, leaving borrowers to bear the brunt of inconsistent practices.
 
The GST council’s decision to exempt penal charges by banks or financial institutions from GST has finally addressed the legal and ethical concerns surrounding the issue. However, this clarification raises the critical question of refunds. Banks have been collecting GST on penal charges since April 2024 and this amount must be refunded to borrowers promptly.
 
Given the scale of the issue, the refunds are expected to run into hundreds of crores rupees. Ensuring the timely and transparent return of this money will require active oversight from RBI's department of Supervision and consumer education and protection department (CEPD). Borrowers must also be informed of their rights to claim these refunds to avoid further grievances.
 
Comments
abhay1955
3 weeks ago
I am happy with this development. With computerized environment, the data centre of each bank can find out all the details pertaining to this GST recovery, like name, account number, GST recovered, etc. and the programmer can prepare a small programme that will initiate refund without making the eligible customers to write letters. This whole exercise shouldn't take long time.
Thariyan Tharayil
3 weeks ago
One of the biggest problems with communication with a bank is that they simply ignore our request or the ill adviced/ novice customer support executive (CSE) or multiple CSE, as per their shift, keeps on repeating/copy paste a standard reply without even trying to understand the issue.
CSE of new age private banks are very much reluctant to escalate the issue to their seniors. Following options can be tried to address the issue 1) Customers should be provided an IVR option to escalate their complaint. 2) Email to CS is very difficult to track and not visible to nodal officer/ombudsman/RBI. CSE generally starts a new email chain to deliberately masquerade the long history of an issue 3) Each complaint should start a thread and the reply from CS should be made available under the customer logon with complete history. This shall be able to be exported in pdf format by the customer, with the banks digital signature to confirm its authenticity at any time. 4) A mechanism to tag/ notify the nodal officer or ombudsman will suffice for escalation.
r_ashok41
4 weeks ago
Good and hope banks refunds the amount and does not wait for FM directive and people know banks will say still more clarification is required etc to delay payment to the customers hence FM should send a note to all banks/nbfc on this to refund with a time frame of say one month and not waiting for customer to follow up with the bank on this
GST Council Waives GST on Penal Interest on Loans; Defers Insurance Tax Decisions amid Mixed Reactions
Moneylife Digital Team 23 December 2024
In a significant development at the 55th GST council meeting held in Jaisalmer (Rajasthan) concluded with several significant tax framework modifications while the much-anticipated decision on restructuring GST rates for insurance...
Taxpayer Has Right To Offset STCL against LTCG for Reducing Tax Liability: ITAT
Moneylife Digital Team 12 December 2024
Upholding a taxpayer's right to offset short-term capital losses (STCL) against long-term capital gains (LTCG) for reducing tax liability, the Mumbai bench of the income-tax appellate tribunal (ITAT) rejected the claim of tax evasion...
ITAT Dismisses AO's Addition of Rs3 Crore as Cash Credit for Gift Received from NRI Son
Moneylife Digital Team 12 December 2024
Rapping the assessment officer (AO) of the income-tax (I-T) department for relying on information sourced from a Google search and local newspaper reports to make an addition under Section 68 of the I-T Act, the Mumbai bench of the...
CBIC Rejects Media Reports as Speculative on GoM’s GST Rate Recommendations
Moneylife Digital Team 04 December 2024
The central board of indirect taxes and customs (CBIC) has rejected media reports regarding the group of ministers (GoM) recommendations on goods and services tax (GST) rate changes on various goods and services saying that such...
ArrayArray
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback