MLF Seminar: Can Opinion Polls Predict Election Outcomes?
Moneylife Digital Team 04 February 2015
“Opinion polls can be fairly accurate because robust statistical methodologies support them,” said leading mathematician Dr Rajeeva L Karandikar
 
Can a sample size of, say, 20,000 voters be sufficient to predict the outcome in a country with over 700 million voters? This is what Dr Rajeeva L Karandikar, director, Chennai Mathematical Institute, who has nearly 20 years of experience in statistical study of elections and trends in voting, explained at a Moneylife Foundation event sponsored by BARC India. This was followed by a highly interactive discussion with Paritosh Joshi, member of the technical committee for the Broadcast Audience Research Council India and the Media Research Users’ Council.
 
Using simple math and statistics, lots of common sense and a good understanding of the ground reality, can yield a very good forecast or predictions about the outcome of elections based on opinion polls and exit polls. These ingredients, along with domain knowledge, are what go into psephology, explained Dr Karandikar, who has a success rate of 85% in his predictions. He repeatedly emphasised that, if ethically done by following robust statistical methodology, opinion polls can be fairly accurate. But since the results are based on probability, there is always the chance that they could, in some situations, be off the mark.
 
“The media hypes up poll projections as the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,” he said. “But, in reality,” he continued, “polls should be seen as an indication of who is likely to win; will anyone get majority and so on. And it also gives a deeper insight into why people voted the way they did.”
 
Dr Karandikar started his discussion by talking about the scientific basis of opinion polls, their power as well as limitations. The primary aspect of an opinion poll is the sample used to get a truly representative sample in a country with a voting population as large as India’s. He demonstrated an experiment to the audience using probability theory and said that opinion polls use a basic probability calculation to estimate the likelihood of voters’ preferences based on which they can predict who will win in an election.
 
A sample needs to be of the right size, not very large, irrespective of the total population of voters. This held good, even if the sample size was 4,000 irrespective of whether a constituency had 100,000 voters or 2 million voters. Sampling, if properly done, has the power of determining the winner with 99% probability, said Dr Karandikar. Random sampling is a must to remove any bias. Failure to select a random sample can lead to wrong conclusions.
 
Dr Karandikar’s detailed presentation on opinion polls was followed by a very lively discussion led by Mr Joshi. In the course of the discussion, when asked about the efficiency of the sample size and data collected. Dr Karandikar pointed out the limitations posed by resources to conduct large sample surveys in a country of India’s size. There are costs involved and, therefore, increasing the sample size would end up being prohibitive in terms of costs. There was also the problem of trained and reliable manpower to conduct the surveys. Hence, they try to achieve the minimum possible sample size to get an effective result.
 
He also mentioned that the pre-election polls have a low predictive power due to volatility of opinion, not all respondents may vote and some may hide the truth as well. “Exit polls were devised to correct these effects: the gap between the opinion poll and date of voting and also the fact that only between 50% and 70% voters actually vote,” he explained. In India, “leaders change parties and parties change alliances, leading to instability in voter preferences,” he pointed out. Referring to previous surveys, he said that voters change their preferences across dates, and staggered polling dates can also affect voter preferences.
 
Anand Halve, brand strategist and co-founder of chlorophyll, asked whether people accurately respond to sensitive data. Dr Karandikar explained how questionnaires are prepared and other statistical techniques used to resolve issues such as replying to sensitive questions.
 
Dr Karandikar explained in detail how random samples are picked using the master data of electoral rolls. In cases where data cannot be collected, the sample size would be small compared to the universe. Further, Mr Joshi wondered about the ethical use of opinion polls and how they can affect the actual election outcome. Several questions are raised about the integrity of opinion polls. Last year, in a sting operation, a number of opinion polling agencies approached by undercover reporters agreed to manipulate poll data. Dr Karandikar agreed that opinion polls can be manipulated; therefore, he emphasised the need for an audit system to verify and authenticate the polls conducted. This event was supported by the BARC India. 
Comments
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback