MakeMyTrip Asked To Pay Rs2 Lakh Compensation for Deficiency in Tour Package
Moneylife Digital Team 31 January 2024
While upholding an order passed by the Rajasthan state consumer disputes redressal commission, the national consumer disputes redressal commission (NCDRC) directed MakeMyTrip India Pvt Ltd to pay Rs2 lakh compensation and Rs21,000 litigation cost for deficiency in service for a tour package. 
In an order last week, the NCDRC bench of Subhash Chandra (presiding member) and Dr Sadhna Shanker (member) says, "Premium inclusions at Singapore shows that there was three nights accommodation and the proposed hotel was Marina Bay Sands, Singapore but the booking was made only for two nights, i.e. from 24 June 2012 (check-in) to 26 June 2012 (check out). It is to be noted that had the change of hotels been made subject to non-availability, it was the duty and responsibility of the travel company to inform the complainant well in advance but the travel company had not informed the complainant. Further, by providing the details of the tour in the last day, the travel company did not give the complainant the time to seek out or make any adjustments to the same in consultation with the travel company. Considering the above, we are of the view that the travel company is deficient in providing service to the complainant causing him inconvenience and hardships."
"...keeping in view the fact that complainant is aged above 75 years and was travelling along with his two grandchildren, the compensation granted by the state commission is just and proper. And the state commission has passed a just and well-reasoned Order, which does not call for any interference by this Commission," NCDRC says.
Jaipur-based Devraj Beharnani had booked a travel package with MakeMyTrip to visit Jakarta, Bali and Singapore for himself and his grandchildren from 17 June 2012 to 26 June 2012 and after that for himself to stay in Singapore up to 2 July 2012. The tour package included obtaining necessary visas, air tickets and reservation of accommodation in hotels, pick and drop facilities, one veg and two non-veg meals, sightseeing, and his travel insurance policy. Mr Beharnani paid Rs4.50 lakh to MakeMyTrip for the tour package. 
Mr Beharnani alleged that MakeMyTrip had not provided the travel itinerary, hotel booking chart, check-out time for hotels, tickets for flights, and travel insurance policy well within time intentionally. "It is only on the evening of 16 June 2012, MakeMyTrip provided the details regarding reservation, accommodation and other facilities and on 17 June 2012 in the early morning, my grandchildren and I had to leave for Delhi for an onward tour."
Further, instead of booking the tickets in direct flights, MakeMyTrip changed the route and booked the tickets on double hopping flight of Air Asia from Singapore to Jakarta, requiring a change of aircraft first at Singapore for Bali and then at Bali for Jakarta with the whole day in transit, Mr Beharnani says, adding, "As the flight from Singapore to Jakarta was indefinitely delayed, I and my grandchildren were asked to wait at Singapore Airport for at least five to six hours. We were not supposed to wait at Singapore Airport for an indefinite time. I purchased three new tickets at 250 Singapore dollars for each ticket, totalling 750 Singapore dollars, which is equivalent to Indian Rs33,000."
Mr Beharnani also alleged that MakeMyTrip changed their hotel accommodations in Jakarta, Bali and Singapore.
When he filed a complaint, MakeMyTrip sent him an email informing him that Rs1,62,681 would be refunded within seven days by crediting the same to his credit card account. However, no money was refunded by MakeMyTrip till Mr Beharnani filed a complaint before the state commission.
He sought a refund of Rs4.50 lakh with an interest at 18%pa (per annum), Rs50 lakh compensation for monetary loss as also for physical and mental agony and Rs66,000 litigation costs. 
MakeMyTrip, in its written statement before the state commission, stated that the complaint is not maintainable under the eye of the law and the state commission does not have the jurisdiction to deal with this matter as the courts of the national capital region (NCR) Delhi have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the dispute. MakeMyTrip stated that the delay of five to six hours at Singapore airport pertains to the operational issue of the airline company and it has no control over such unwarranted delay. "There was only a two-hour break in the journey, which was not a big issue and the travel company acted as a booking agent; therefore, the liability cannot be vested upon it."
While allowing the complaint, the Rajasthan state commission directed MakeMyTrip to pay Rs2 lakh compensation for deficiency in service along with Rs21,000 as litigation costs. 
Aggrieved by the state commission's order, MakeMyTrip filed an appeal before NCDRC.
The counsel for MakeMyTrip argued that Rajasthan state commission had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as the travel company had neither carried its business within the vicinity of Jaipur nor had the cause of action arisen at Jaipur. He further argued that MakeMyTrip is only a facilitator and acts as an agent and not a service provider; hence, it is not responsible for flight operations. He further submitted that, as per the itinerary, the names of the hotels provided to Mr Beharnani were proposed hotels and subject to availability, and the rooms were not available; therefore, the accommodation was provided in other hotels.
Ramlal, the manager of Mr Beharnani, submitted that the travel package was booked at the Jaipur office of MakeMyTrip; therefore, the cause of action arose at Jaipur. He further submitted that due to mismanagement and irresponsible attitude on the part of MakeMyTrip, Mr Beharnani had spent extra money on hotels. He further argued that MakeMyTrip is an internationally renowned tour organiser; therefore, its duty is to make foolproof arrangements so that no inconvenience would be caused to Mr Beharnani but delay and confusion in getting the rooms in hotels, keeping facsimile of his credit card, hopping flights in place of direct flights have caused unnecessary physical and mental agony.
After perusing the documents on record, NCDRC noted that since the package was booked from the Jaipur office of MakeMyTrip and Mr Beharnani is also a resident of the same city, the Rajasthan state commission has territorial jurisdiction to deal with the complaint. 
The bench also referred to an email sent by Mr Beharnani to MakeMyTrip on 15 June 2012 and a reply received on 16 June 2012 from the travel company. "It is apparent that all the details of the flights and the proposed hotels and vouchers had not been provided well in advance. The mail sent by the executive staff of MakeMyTrip also reflects that the travel company had not provided all the details of the hotel voucher, transfer vouchers and the sightseeing voucher well in time prior to the departure, which was on 17 June 2012."
Dismissing the appeal as devoid of merit, NCDRC asked MakeMyTrip to pay Mr Beharnani Rs2 lakh compensation and Rs21,000 as litigation costs as awarded by the Rajasthan state commission.
(First Appeal No236 of 2018  Date: 22 January 2024)
3 weeks ago
This is just a drop in the ocean. I bet if we have an exclusive consumer court for dealings of the people with the government offices, all these cases appear to be miniscule and absolutely insensational.
1 month ago
Can someone guide how to proceed with the complaints against MMT. We were in touch with their customer helpdesk and very conveniently they told us after an exchange of few mails that the helpdesk ticket is close now and we have to again raise it as a new complaint. They are very bad and pathetic with their services
1 month ago
This case made interesting reading. Traveller's especially senior citizens pin all their hopes on MMT to ensure no inconvenience takes place particularly in foreign lands. MMT should bee very efficient in ensuring safe touring as much money has been invested.
1 month ago
They r like this .We r senior citizens above 70.we booked Europe trip with them paid 53000in advance but due to lock down during Corona .they cancelled the trip.After somemonths they give option either u take flight voucher or u can keep itopen for next time.We prefer to keep it open.but in 2023 we plan again for trip.They refuse to have any amount lying with them.They said u again book it in 2021and didn't gofor that.It was done by their employee although we refused to go in that due to corona. Chor company.we were their old customer but now we suggest to not opt this company.daaku
Mumbai Pre-polls 'Shock' - Tata Power Proposes 201% Tariff Hike for Low-end Users
IANS 30 January 2024
In a bolt from the blue ahead of the elections, Tata Power Co Ltd has proposed a huge increase in the power rates for Mumbaikars, particularly the lower-end users as part of a tariff rationalisation initiative.
The average...
House Damaged due to Water Leakage from Sewerage: SBI General Insurance and Bhawanigarh Municipal Council Asked To Pay Rs4.75 Lakh
Moneylife Digital Team 30 January 2024
Holding the Bhawanigarh municipal council deficient in not maintaining water pipes, the national consumer disputes redressal commission (NCDRC) directed the municipal council to pay Rs2.37 lakh to a house-owner. NCDRC also directed...
Fraud Alert: Social Media Financial Scams
Yogesh Sapkale, 25 January 2024
A few days ago, one of my friends, working in a reputed organisation and earning a good salary, received a WhatsApp message offering a job opportunity to earn Rs3,000 per day just by clicking ratings on Google Maps to increase the...
Housing Society Problems & Solutions: Elected Committee Member Does Not Reside in the Society and De-registering a CHS
Shirish Shanbhag 25 January 2024
The managing committee of a cooperative housing society (CHS/Society) is essentially its nerve centre, handling member grievances and also overseeing financial management, among other day-to-day managerial activities within the...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit