GST on Penalties: How Banks Are Double-dipping on your Hard-earned Money
Chandramouli Mohan 16 May 2025
The Hidden Cost of Falling Short
Imagine this: You’re juggling bills, groceries and school fees and one month you dip below your bank’s minimum balance requirement. Next thing you know, your bank slaps you with a penalty. Annoying, right? But wait—there’s more! On top of this penalty, you’re charged 18% goods and services tax (GST). Suddenly, your small slip-up feels like a costly crime.
 
If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone. Over the past five years, India’s 13 public sector banks (PSBs) have quietly collected a jaw-dropping Rs8,495 crore from customers who couldn’t keep up with minimum average balance (MAB) or quarterly average balance (QAB) rules. (Moneylife article Minimum Average Balance: Public Sector Banks Collected Rs8,495 Crore since FY19-20 from Customers, Says Govt). And, in a twist worthy of a financial thriller, nearly Rs1,300 crore of that is just GST on these penalties!
 
Banking on Penalties: A Closer Look
We all know banks offer services—money transfers—NEFT (national electronic funds transfer), RTGS (real-time gross settlement) , demand draft, IMPS (immediate payment service), etc safe deposit lockers, cheque books and more—and GST applies to most of these. But did you know some banking transactions are exempt from GST? According to government notifications, when banks take deposits or give loans (except via credit cards), GST doesn’t apply. Why? Because the 'service' here is really just interest- banks pay you for deposits, you pay them for loans. No goods, no taxable service.
 
So why, then, are banks charging GST on penalties for not maintaining your balance? Is this just a technicality—or a lucrative loophole?
 
Notification of Exempted Services
Notification no. 12/2017 CTR (Link Notification12-CGST.pdf) provides a list of services which are exempted from GST. 
 
 
Penalty ≠ Service: The Legal Loophole
Let’s get this straight: When you open a savings or current account, you agree to certain terms, including keeping a minimum balance. If you slip up, you pay a penalty. But here’s the kicker—this penalty isn’t a 'service' you’re buying. It’s a deterrent, a contractual slap on the wrist.
 
The law seems clear: Entry 27(a) of notification 12/2017 says deposits (including savings accounts) are GST-exempt.  No goods, no service, no GST. Yet, banks have been tacking on GST to these penalties, turning a simple penalty into a double whammy.
 
Classic Example and Clarification by CBIC (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs)
Circular no. 178/10/2022-GST dated 3 August 2022 explicitly states that penalties imposed for violation of laws—such as traffic violations or pollution laws—are not subject to GST. The rationale is that these penalties are not consideration for any supply of goods or services. There is no agreement between the government and the violator to tolerate the violation in return for payment of penalty; rather, penalties are imposed to penalise and deter such violations.
 
The circular further explains that fines and penalties paid for violation of provisions of law do not constitute consideration, as no service is received in lieu of payment of such fines and penalties. This position was also supported in earlier service tax regimes and continues under GST.
 
Twist in the Tale: The Loan Penalty Precedent
Recently, the plot thickened. The GST council and  CBIC clarified that penalties for late loan payments aren’t taxable under GST. Why? Because these are just consequences for breaking a contract, not payments for a service. Thanks to Moneylife article Moneylife Impact: GST on Penal Charges Out; Refunds Must Follow
 
As the CBIC put it: 
“The essence of a contract is its ‘performance’ and not its ‘breach’... Penal charges are for preventing breach of contract or non-performance and are thus mere ‘events’ in a contract.”
 
2.4  Penal charges levied by REs (regulated entities), in compliance with RBI (Reserve Bank of India) directions dated 18.08.2023 are essentially in the nature of charges for breach of terms of contract and hence, fall within the ambit of the above clarification”.
 
“2.5 Thus, as recommended by the 55th GST Council, it is hereby clarified that no GST is payable on the penal charges levied by Regulated Entities, in compliance with RBI directions dated 18.08.2023, for non-compliance with material terms and conditions of loan contract by the borrower”
                                                                                  (Ref Link Circular-55thGSTC-Services-1.pdf)
 
If that is true for loans, shouldn’t it be true for savings and current account penalties, too? After all, a penalty is a penalty, whether you missed a loan installment or fell short on your balance.
 
Real-world Impact: Kicking Customers When They’re Down
Let’s face it—if you’re unable to maintain a minimum balance, you’re probably already feeling the pinch. Adding 18% GST to your penalty is like rubbing salt in the wound. Over five years, PSBs alone have collected Rs1,295 crore in GST from these penalties from SB account holders. Imagine the total if we count private banks and the penalties paid by the current account holders!
 
And here’s the irony: The people hit hardest by these charges are often those least able to afford them.
 
What Needs to Change: A Call to Action
It’s time for a reality check. RBI, the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA), All India Bank Depositors’ Association (AIBDA) and consumer advocates must push the government to exempt these penalties from GST—just as they did for loan penalties. This is not about blaming banks or regulators; it is about fairness. If a penalty for breaking a contract on a loan isn’t a service, neither is a penalty for not keeping a minimum balance.
 
The Bottom Line: Fair Play for All
The rules should be the same across the board. Customers should not be punished twice for a simple mistake—once by the bank, and again by the taxman. It is time to close the GST penalty trap and bring some much-needed relief to millions of account-holders.
 
After all, what is good for the goose should be good for the gander. Don’t you think?
 
If you have ever been stung by a penalty plus GST, share your story! Let’s make some noise for fair banking.
 
(Chandramouli Mohan retired as a senior manager from a public sector bank after 38 years of service in various capacities in several places across the country. He has been an RTI and consumer activist since his retirement in March 2020.)
Comments
Prashanth
4 weeks ago
Sir , can i use the screenshot of this article to tag to my request in twitter to clarification on this gst taging FM and GST council along with HDFC bank. I receievd email from HDFC bank they are not able to reverse the gst even though charges are reversed .
tenkaraimohan
Replied to Prashanth comment 2 weeks ago
Yes Mr Prashanth. You can. After all this article is available in public domain
r_ashok41
1 month ago
i think there should be a way to ensure that customers do not dig into their minimum balance so that it does not go into it heavy charges.
Girish Mittal
1 month ago
Also when they charge to customer and later on the charge is reversed, many banks like Axis do not reverse the GST. When there is no service charge - there is no GST. And banks would be easily pocketing this GST amount as profit in their balance sheet. Also, banks do not raise tax invoice for services/charges which they take from customer !!! This itself is violation of GST laws !!!
Housing Society Problems and Solutions: Who Votes, Who Pays and What’s in a Name?
Shirish Shanbhag 08 May 2025
Managing or living in a cooperative housing society (CHS/the Society) often means dealing with a range of legal, procedural and practical challenges—many of which are not always clearly understood by residents or committee members....
Pegasus-maker NSO Ordered To Pay US$170mn for Targeting WhatsApp Users
Moneylife Digital Team 07 May 2025
A United States (US) federal court has ordered Israeli spyware company NSO Group to pay nearly US$170mn (million) in damages to WhatsApp and its parent company Meta, in a landmark ruling over the illegal surveillance of around 1,400...
AI in Customer Service: Frustration with Glitchy Automation and Data Capture
Sucheta Dalal, 02 May 2025
The customer is king—a much quoted business mantra coined by Harry Gordon Selfridge a century ago—is more of a hollow slogan today. Instead, customers of giant organisations are forced deal with ‘systems’ that work at avoiding a human...
Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe in Builder-bank Nexus in Supertech Projects across NCR
Moneylife Digital Team 02 May 2025
Expressing concern over how home-buyers in the National Capital Region (NCR) have been held 'to ransom', the Supreme Court ordered a preliminary probe by the central bureau of investigation (CBI) into an alleged nexus between real...
Array
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback