Kushal Nath (names changed) earns ₹12,000 a month as a contract worker and supports a family of 13. He managed to borrow from six digital apps, each charging 36%–40%pa (per annum), landing him with a combined equated monthly instalment (EMI) load of ₹46,700, nearly four times his income. Sandeep Khanna, an HR executive earning ₹25,000, has 14 app loans outstanding totalling nearly ₹20 lakh. Ram Gopal, a chauffeur on ₹40,000 salary, owes ₹17 lakh across five digital lenders. Vijay Singh, a delivery executive, has borrowed from 20 separate creditors including banks, finance companies and apps, to accumulate ₹37 lakh in outstanding debt. Bhushan, who works as a company manager, has run up a cumulative loan outstanding of ₹1.14 crore from 30 sources, including informal ‘hand loans’.
These are not exceptional cases. They are representative of the emails from distressed borrowers landing every day at Moneylife Foundation, our not-for-profit sister entity.
The Foundation began receiving requests for counselling in early-2025, harking back to 2010, when the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had to crack down on reckless credit card and personal loans that ruined lakhs of people. Emails to the Foundation indicate a similar desperation for help in avoiding debt traps. Over the past year, we have collated data on more than 107 digital lending apps and the interest rates and fee structures actually charged by them. Because our study is ongoing, we are not publishing lender names in this column.
Rates reported by borrowers vary from 30% to 57.45% depending on tenure and company. Three lenders offering short-tenure loans are charging at 1% per day which annualises to a stupendous 365%. The borrowers seeking help fall into two broad groups.
The first: salaried or informally employed individuals in the 26–45 age group who cite a health emergency as the trigger for their first app loan, after which multiple borrowings follow in quick succession. The second: educated, relatively well-paid professionals—several of them software engineers—who lost money on stock trading, exhausted personal loans and credit card limits and turned to costlier digital credit.
Both groups arrive at the same crisis point when lenders begin pursuing them through their workplaces and family contacts, or when they have exhausted all sources but desperately want to protect their credit score.
The pattern raises an urgent systemic question. If lenders comply with RBI rules and report to India's four credit bureaus, how are individuals able to accumulate debt far beyond any plausible repayment capacity from dozens of lenders? Either the credit bureau checks are failing or they are being ignored. Either way, the regulator needs to investigate and act.
Usurious Rates
High interest rates are only the starting point. Processing fees range from 2% to 15% of loan value and are deducted upfront while disbursing the loan. Several lenders charge late fees of 36%pa on overdue amounts. Bounce charges, stamp duty and service fees add another layer of cost. On short-tenure loans of seven to 30 days, these fixed costs truly determine the borrower's cost and they are brutal. A ₹500 processing fee on a ₹10,000 seven-day loan annualises to roughly 260%. The loan's headline rate may be 30%, but the borrower pays nearly three times that.
RBI tried to address this opacity in April 2024, mandating a standardised Key Facts Statement (KFS). Lenders had to disclose to borrowers a single annual percentage rate (APR) that folds in all charges — interest, fees and penalties — before the borrower signs. The intent was to give every borrower one, easy-to-comprehend number.
Moneylife Foundation's data shows that at least two lenders have structured their charges as flat fixed fees rather than interest to keep them out of the APR calculation. One lender shows an APR of 35% on its website while its app store listing implies a daily rate of 0.25%–1% which is 91%-365% annualised. Both cannot be accurate simultaneously.
RBI's Digital Lending Directions of May 2025 have further tightened disclosures and mandate that all charges, regardless of how they are named, to be included in the KFS. Whether every non-banking finance company (NBFC)-lending service provider (LSP) partnership has implemented this in practice is a different question.
The Escape Route
Under Indian law, only RBI-registered banks and NBFCs may legally extend credit to the public. Fin-tech companies exploited this distinction systematically. A digital app is just a software, not a lender. Yet, it acquires borrowers, assesses creditworthiness through proprietary algorithms and manages the customer relationship. The loan, however, is formally disbursed by an NBFC partner, registered with RBI.
The app operates as a lending service-provider (LSP): it owns the customer, originates the loan, has ruthless recovery tactics and earns a fee from the NBFC, while remaining outside direct RBI supervision. The NBFC is regulated; the app-based lender and it usurious rates are not.
This structure also obscures market concentration by allowing one NBFC to partner with several digital apps, appearing as separate lenders. The borrower has no way to know whether they are dealing with the same underlying entity.
The RBI's Digital Lending Guidelines of September 2022 had attempted to fix this by making NBFCs formally responsible for the conduct of their LSPs. In practice, accountability remained opaque. Grievance redressal officers, mandated by RBI are often listed as generic email addresses routed to the NBFC, not to the LSP that interacts with borrowers.
RBI’s supervision is weak and patchy. The RBI governor publicly warned that some NBFCs were pursuing growth targets by pushing high-cost credit at the cost of borrowers who could not afford it. It went on to issue cease-and-desist orders to four NBFCs in October 2024, barring them from sanctioning or disbursing new loans. But the restrictions were lifted in January 2025.
As part of a broader attempt to remove usurious lenders, the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) had blocked two major apps in 2023, while Google removed more than 4,700 illegal loan apps from the Play Store over two years, since they were not associated with registered lenders. Clearly, regulation, on its own, is not sufficient.
Debt as Extortion
A bigger worry is another category of lenders. At least 16 apps in the data gathered by the Moneylife Foundation seem to have no verifiable NBFC backing; no functioning grievance mechanism; and, in some cases, no traceable legal entity. For these operators, real leverage is the device permissions granted by borrower on sign-up. It gives them access to contacts, photographs and call logs.
Defaults lead to a recovery process built on blackmail, threatening messages to family and employers, morphed obscene images of the borrower distributed on social media, demands to take new loans from other apps to repay the first. These tactics have sometimes led to suicides.
Over the past three years, multiple agencies have worked at blocking digital apps with extortive practices or links to foreign nationals. In February 2025, the enforcement directorate (ED) froze ₹123.58 crore linked to a ₹719-crore fake loan app network with Chinese connections. But data provided by distressed borrowers show that usurious lending and abusive recovery tactics are unchanged.
Aparna Ramchandra, founder of Rectify Credit, who volunteers as a counsellor for the Foundation, says that thousands of ruthless app-based lenders continue to prey on gullible or desperate borrowers.
Persistent Gaps
RBI's Digital Lending Directions of May 2025 are, indeed, a fairly comprehensive regulatory response to the problem. They mandate registration of all digital lending apps on the Centralised Information Management System (CIMS) portal, creating a public registry that borrowers can use to verify app lenders. They prohibit apps from accessing contact lists, call logs, or device files beyond strict know-your-customer (KYC) requirements. They require loans to be disbursed directly into borrower accounts, eliminating the pool accounts that obscured fund flows. They require a board-approved cooling-off period of at least one day during which a borrower can exit without penalty. They make NBFCs unambiguously liable for all LSP conduct.
Yet, several problems persist. First, although they flag exorbitant interest rates, they do not mandate a cap, only a disclosure of APR. Second, the CIMS registry reaches only apps connected to regulated entities. Unregistered operators are able to find desperate individuals with great ease. Third, making NBFCs liable for LSP conduct only works if NBFCs actively police their partners and are strictly supervised by RBI. The Foundation's data suggests that neither is happening.
Unless there is systematic monitoring, followed by swift and deterrent penalties, rather than occasional cease-and-desist orders, expensive app loans will continue to push people into debt traps.
If you would like to share your experience with digital apps for our study, please write to [email protected] — anonymity will be maintained, but correct details are essential.
I am writing to formally bring to your attention an organized, systemic financial syndicate operating through a network of predatory mobile lending applications. This digital racket is actively defrauding, extorting, and terrorizing thousands of Indian citizens on a daily basis by exploiting legitimate banking infrastructure and utilizing regulatory loopholes to bypass oversight.
A structural overview of this operational syndicate, its predatory financial mechanics, and its severe violations of consumer data protections are detailed below for your immediate journalistic investigation:
I. The Institutional and Regulatory Cover
This syndicate operates a multi-app front, launching dozens of seemingly independent applications to trap unsuspecting users. While these apps present an outward appearance of consumer utility, they operate under the explicit regulatory cover, partnerships, or direct backing of legitimate, RBI-registered Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). The primary entities providing infrastructure to this network include, but are not limited to:
Solomon Capital Private Limited (RBI Registration No: N-14.03320)
Associated Digital Applications: Bharat Loan, Salaryontime, Brightloan, Fastpaise, Fast Salary, SnapPaise, fundobaba, LendingPlate, Duniya Finance, Everydayloan, CreditSea, and multiple interconnected sister platforms.
II. Structural Mechanics of the Predatory Debt Trap
The operational model of these applications is intentionally engineered to prevent a borrower from ever successfully liquidating their debt, effectively forcing them into a permanent financial trap:
Extortionate Pricing Framework: Borrowers face an immediate, flat 10% upfront deduction labeled as a "processing fee" before disbursement, combined with an un-hedged, compounding 1% daily interest rate—amounting to an illegal annualized percentage rate (APR) exceeding 365%.
Non-Compliant Penal Structures: Upon a single day of repayment delay, the syndicate attaches an aggressive, compounding 2% daily penalty. This directly violates the Reserve Bank of India’s explicit directives on fair lending practices and penal charges (RBI Circular: RBI/2023-24/53), which mandates that penal charges must be reasonable and non-compounding.
The Multi-App Rolling Debt Spiral: Because the predatory daily interest and upfront deductions consume the entirety of the borrower's monthly income, the principal amount is never reduced. To service the monthly interest of one app, victims are structurally manipulated and targeted by sister applications within the same syndicate offering immediate "re-loans". This creates an artificial, multi-app debt spiral that completely drains a victim's bank account every 30 days.
III. Cyber-Terrorism, Forced Data Harvesting, and Human Cost
When repayments face minor disruptions due to these compounding monthly traps, the recovery desks shift from financial collection to active cyber-terrorism:
Forced Device Permissions and Data Theft: These applications mandate deep device permissions prior to disbursement, harvesting the user's complete contact repository, private data, and media galleries in structural violation of the Right to Privacy and the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act.
Social Lynching and Psychological Warfare: Recovery agents utilize this stolen data to launch coordinated defamation campaigns. They contact the victim's family, friends, and professional colleagues, labeling the borrower a "fraud". In extreme cases, morphed photographs and highly abusive communications are sent across the victim's social circle, causing severe psychological trauma and directly instigating self-harm and suicide.
The vast human cost of this unchecked ecosystem is visible across public forums like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit, where thousands of affected citizens are raising their voices daily to report severe harassment, structural data breaches, and systemic institutional non-responsiveness from standard grievance cells.
IV. Media Action and Investigative Remedies Requested
This is an organized financial racket utilizing legitimate banking channels to siphon extorted money out of Indian citizens. I request your investigative team to launch a comprehensive exposé on this ecosystem and highlight the following critical demands:
Audit of Corporate Banking Channels: Investigate the underlying banking channels, payment gateways, and directors of these sister applications and their backing NBFCs to expose the flow of extorted funds.
Regulatory Enforcement via MeitY: Raise public pressure on the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and app marketplaces (Google Play Store and Apple App Store) to execute a total operational ban on these non-compliant, predatory applications.
Criminal Liability Under BNS: Demand strict enforcement of law by law enforcement authorities under the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and the Information Technology Act for extortion, cheating, data theft, and criminal intimidation.
The comprehensive digital trails, transaction histories, and extensive victim testimonies documenting this syndicate are widely available for your team's objective review, including documented community platforms dedicated to defending public interests against these violations:
Public Reference: Borrowers' Rights Public Documentation Archive
Thank you for your dedication to public interest journalism, objective scrutiny, and consumer advocacy.
A post on X recently caught the attention of thousands of Indian car-owners. It described a man who had wrapped the key to his ₹12 lakh car in aluminium foil — not because the key was damaged or because of some quirky local...
More than one billion (100 crore) credentials were harvested by malware in the past 12 months alone. That figure does not include credentials stolen through phishing, data breaches or social engineering — only malware. If you have...
In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has held that insurance companies cannot reject hospitalisation claims simply because they are filed after the policy deadline — a decision that could reshape how health insurance claims are...
It started with what seemed like a routine message.
Ramesh Kulkarni, a small-business owner in Pune, received a WhatsApp message from what appeared to be his bank's customer support team. His account would be blocked, the message...
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )
THE EDITORIAL & INVESTIGATIVE TEAM
Respected Sir/Madam,
I am writing to formally bring to your attention an organized, systemic financial syndicate operating through a network of predatory mobile lending applications. This digital racket is actively defrauding, extorting, and terrorizing thousands of Indian citizens on a daily basis by exploiting legitimate banking infrastructure and utilizing regulatory loopholes to bypass oversight.
A structural overview of this operational syndicate, its predatory financial mechanics, and its severe violations of consumer data protections are detailed below for your immediate journalistic investigation:
I. The Institutional and Regulatory Cover
This syndicate operates a multi-app front, launching dozens of seemingly independent applications to trap unsuspecting users. While these apps present an outward appearance of consumer utility, they operate under the explicit regulatory cover, partnerships, or direct backing of legitimate, RBI-registered Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). The primary entities providing infrastructure to this network include, but are not limited to:
Solomon Capital Private Limited (RBI Registration No: N-14.03320)
Devmuni Leasing & Finance Limited (RBI Registration No: B-14.027.19)
Associated Digital Applications: Bharat Loan, Salaryontime, Brightloan, Fastpaise, Fast Salary, SnapPaise, fundobaba, LendingPlate, Duniya Finance, Everydayloan, CreditSea, and multiple interconnected sister platforms.
II. Structural Mechanics of the Predatory Debt Trap
The operational model of these applications is intentionally engineered to prevent a borrower from ever successfully liquidating their debt, effectively forcing them into a permanent financial trap:
Extortionate Pricing Framework: Borrowers face an immediate, flat 10% upfront deduction labeled as a "processing fee" before disbursement, combined with an un-hedged, compounding 1% daily interest rate—amounting to an illegal annualized percentage rate (APR) exceeding 365%.
Non-Compliant Penal Structures: Upon a single day of repayment delay, the syndicate attaches an aggressive, compounding 2% daily penalty. This directly violates the Reserve Bank of India’s explicit directives on fair lending practices and penal charges (RBI Circular: RBI/2023-24/53), which mandates that penal charges must be reasonable and non-compounding.
The Multi-App Rolling Debt Spiral: Because the predatory daily interest and upfront deductions consume the entirety of the borrower's monthly income, the principal amount is never reduced. To service the monthly interest of one app, victims are structurally manipulated and targeted by sister applications within the same syndicate offering immediate "re-loans". This creates an artificial, multi-app debt spiral that completely drains a victim's bank account every 30 days.
III. Cyber-Terrorism, Forced Data Harvesting, and Human Cost
When repayments face minor disruptions due to these compounding monthly traps, the recovery desks shift from financial collection to active cyber-terrorism:
Forced Device Permissions and Data Theft: These applications mandate deep device permissions prior to disbursement, harvesting the user's complete contact repository, private data, and media galleries in structural violation of the Right to Privacy and the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act.
Social Lynching and Psychological Warfare: Recovery agents utilize this stolen data to launch coordinated defamation campaigns. They contact the victim's family, friends, and professional colleagues, labeling the borrower a "fraud". In extreme cases, morphed photographs and highly abusive communications are sent across the victim's social circle, causing severe psychological trauma and directly instigating self-harm and suicide.
The vast human cost of this unchecked ecosystem is visible across public forums like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit, where thousands of affected citizens are raising their voices daily to report severe harassment, structural data breaches, and systemic institutional non-responsiveness from standard grievance cells.
IV. Media Action and Investigative Remedies Requested
This is an organized financial racket utilizing legitimate banking channels to siphon extorted money out of Indian citizens. I request your investigative team to launch a comprehensive exposé on this ecosystem and highlight the following critical demands:
Audit of Corporate Banking Channels: Investigate the underlying banking channels, payment gateways, and directors of these sister applications and their backing NBFCs to expose the flow of extorted funds.
Regulatory Enforcement via MeitY: Raise public pressure on the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and app marketplaces (Google Play Store and Apple App Store) to execute a total operational ban on these non-compliant, predatory applications.
Criminal Liability Under BNS: Demand strict enforcement of law by law enforcement authorities under the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and the Information Technology Act for extortion, cheating, data theft, and criminal intimidation.
The comprehensive digital trails, transaction histories, and extensive victim testimonies documenting this syndicate are widely available for your team's objective review, including documented community platforms dedicated to defending public interests against these violations:
Public Reference: Borrowers' Rights Public Documentation Archive
Thank you for your dedication to public interest journalism, objective scrutiny, and consumer advocacy.