Consumer Court Orders Flipkart, Seller To Pay Rs14,641 for Not Allowing Return of Substandard Product
Sahyaja MS (Bar  and  Bench) 26 November 2024
A District Consumer Redressal Commission in Mumbai recently ordered e-commerce platform Flipkart India and the seller of the product to pay Rs10,000 in costs to a woman after she was unable to return a food product which she claimed was substandard (Taruna Rajput v Flipkart India).
 
A coram comprising President Samindara Surve and Member Sameer Kamble held that the inability to accept return the product on the grounds of the 'no return policy' of Flipkart amounted to unfair trade practice and was a deficiency in service. 
 
"We therefore observe that not taking back the said product by the Opposite Party nos.1 and 5 on the ground of 'no return policy' amounts to adoption of an unfair trade practice on part of the Opposite Party nos.1 and 5.Since the Opposite Party no. 5 has failed either to replace or paid the value thereof to the Complainant, therefore there is a deficiency service on part of the Opposite Party number 5 is proved," the forum said. 
 
The case involved a complaint filed by one Taruna Rajput, a resident of Goregaon, against Flipkart and seller Deepak Kashyap.
 
According to the complainant, on 9 October 2023, she purchased 13 containers of Herbalife Nutrition Fresh Energy Drink Mix (lemon flavoured) from Flipkart for Rs4,641. 
 
The product was delivered to her on 14 October 2023. Upon inspecting the product, Rajput found the color and texture to be unusual, and also noticed the label lacked a QR code. Suspecting the product was counterfeit, she sought to return it. However, Flipkart rejected her request, citing a "no return policy."
 
Rajput then exchanged several text messages with Flipkart's customer service but was not provided with a satisfactory resolution of her complaint. 
 
The complainant argued that the product was substandard and that Flipkart's refusal to accept the return amounted to unfair trade practices.
 
During the hearing, the complainant submitted photographs showing the unusual texture of the product and SMS correspondence with Flipkart confirming the platform's refusal to process the return. 
 
The Commission found that Flipkart, as the e-commerce platform, was responsible for ensuring the quality of products sold through its marketplace. It concluded that Flipkart and the seller were guilty of deficiency in service and unfair trade practices.
 
However, the Commission dismissed the case against Flipkart's directors, Prabhu Balasrinivasan, Yogesh Gupta and Swati Biswas since no personal allegations had been made against them. 
 
The complainant's request for Rs50 lakh in damages was rejected, as she failed to provide evidence of harmful ingredients or the product being counterfeit.
 
Subsequently, it ordered the e-commerce platform and its seller to refund Rs4,641 to the complainant along with 9% interest from 21 October 2023, until the payment is made. 
 
Additionally, Flipkart and the seller were directed to pay Rs10,000 towards the complainant's legal costs. 
 
 
Comments
UPI Frauds: 27 Lakh Cases Worth Rs2,145 Crore Registered in 30 Months: Govt
Moneylife Digital Team 26 November 2024
Even as the number of payment transactions through unified payment interface (UPI) are increasingly rapidly so are the frauds. From financial year (FY) 22-23 to September 2024, UPI fraud incidents jumped to 2.7mn (million) or 26.99...
Fraud Alert: 614% Jump in Scam-yourself Attacks
Yogesh Sapkale, 22 November 2024
Imagine someone handing you a gun and asking you to shoot your own foot for a handsome reward. Will you do it? Most unlikely. However, this is exactly what is happening in cyberspace. One of the most alarming trends is the rise of...
NCLAT Stays Company-wide Insolvency Process against Raheja Developers
SN Thyagarajan (Bar  and  Bench) 21 November 2024
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Thursday passed an order confining the insolvency process initiated against Raheja Developers to its 'Shilas Low Rise' project.
 
A coram of Chairperson Justice (retd) Ashok...
Housing Society Problems and Solutions: Handling Misbehaving Guards and Redevelopment Setbacks
Shirish Shanbhag 21 November 2024
This week's column addresses a range of issues faced by cooperative housing society (CHS/Society) members, including challenges related to redevelopment projects stalled by government orders, concerns over misbehaving security guards...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback