The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that the legislature should enact a law for terminally ill patients who decide to stop medical treatment.
A five-judge constitution bench headed by justice KM Joseph agreed to modify its 2018 guidelines on 'living will', an advance medical directive on end of life treatment. The bench, also comprising justices Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy, and CT Ravikumar, said only guidelines can be tweaked otherwise it will become a review of its 2018 judgment.
"We are only here to consider improving the guidelines. We should realise the limitations of the court also," it said.
The top court further added that the legislature has more skills and sources of knowledge and the court is not an expert in medicine, therefore, it has to be careful.
It was considering a plea seeking modification of the guidelines for living will/advance medical directive issued by it in 2018.
The bench said the advance directive can be applied only in some cases, where terminally ill patients are not in a position to say that the treatment must stop.
Senior advocate Arvind P Datar, representing The Indian Society for Critical Care, contended that due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders, the procedure under the apex court guidelines has become unworkable.
Additional solicitor general KM Nataraj submitted that few meetings were held with AIIMS' (All-India Institute of Medical Science's) representatives and other stakeholders and a chart of necessary safeguards has been prepared. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing NGO Common Cause, submitted that everybody has an indefeasible right to refuse treatment.
The top court was informed that first a medical board would have to declare that the patient has no scope of recovery, then the district collector would have to set up an independent medical board to obtain a second opinion, and after this, the matter would be referred to a judicial magistrate.
Mr Datar argued that the role of the judicial magistrate can be kept out and recommended that in a living will, there can be two witnesses as he emphasised that the execution of the living will is very cumbersome. The hearing in the matter will continue on Wednesday.
In 2018, a top court judgement had recognised that a person in a persistent vegetative state may execute an advance medical directive or a 'living will' to refuse medical treatment.
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
HDFC Bank Gold Debit Card: NCDRC Upholds District & State Commission's Order; Asks To Settle Accident Insurance Claim Filed in 2009
Moneylife Digital Team
18 January 2023
Upholding the orders passed by the lower fora, the national consumer disputes redressal commission (NCDRC) has dismissed a revised petition filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. Both, the district forum and the state commission, had asked HDFC...
Lucknow man dials airline customer care number, loses Rs1.49 lakh
16 January 2023
A man in Lucknow was allegedly duped of Rs 1.49 lakhs in an online fraud when he dialled the customer care number to find out about a cancelled flight.
This is the 10th such incident that occurred in the last three months,...
Sticky Pricing on Amazon: Are Prime Members Paying More Money than Non-Prime Members?
inputs from Moneylife Team
16 January 2023
Most people who have paid for Amazon’s “Prime” membership, which offers faster and free delivery and a host of other benefits, have always assumed that the premium service at least gives them the best rates, if not better...
Deceptive Ad Trends to Be Wary of in 2023
16 January 2023
Consumers have much to watch out for in terms of deceptive advertising trends in 2023, even as regulatory efforts seek to curb them. Here are just five TINA.org will be keeping an eye on this...