Bombay High Court Orders Maharashtra To Frame Policy To Deal with Vehicles Seized and Dumped in Public Spaces
Sahyaja MS (Bar  and  Bench) 14 April 2025
The Bombay High Court recently directed the Maharashtra government to formulate and place on record a clear policy to address the growing problem of vehicles seized by the police and dumped or parked at public places particularly around police stations in Mumbai (Marathon Maxima Co.Op. Housing Society v BMC).
 
A bench of Justice GS Kulkarni and Justice Advait Sethna directed the police to create a mechanism to promptly shift seized vehicles to designated storage areas instead of parking them in public spaces.
 
The order was passed on a petition filed by the Marathon Maxima Co-operative Housing Society in Mulund which raised concerns over seized vehicles being parked on open private land near their premises. 
 
The society pointed out that the vehicles, often left unattended for years, were an “eyesore” in otherwise clean surroundings and created insurmountable public inconvenience to residents and pedestrians
The Court took strong exception to the continued inaction of the authorities, especially given that it had already raised the issue two years ago. 
 
In April 2023, a coordinate bench that included Justice GS Kulkarni had asked to frame a policy to govern the management of such seized vehicles. Despite nearly two years having passed, there had been no compliance, the Court noted in its order of April 8. 
 
“In Mumbai, open spaces are not available and are a major constraint, hence parking/dumping of seized vehicles cannot be resorted to, causing a serious inconvenience/nuisance to the public at large. We may take judicial notice of the fact that several police stations are inundated with such seized vehicles being dumped/parked for years together outside the police stations encroaching on public roads, which are essential public amenities to be enjoyed and utilized by public at large,” the Court said.
 
The Court said such illegal occupation of roads, pavements and private lands worsened the already dire situation for pedestrians. 
 
“In our opinion, for a city like Mumbai or any other city which encompasses constraints on open spaces, encroachments on footpath, pavements etc. which itself makes the life of pedestrians miserable and added to such woes, are the problems of such illegal parking on open public spaces, pavements/footpaths and in the surroundings of the police stations.”
 
It further criticized the passive approach of the civic and traffic authorities.
 
“When pedestrians themselves cannot normally move on roads and footpaths, the Traffic Department cannot remain a mute spectator on these issues,” the Bench said.
 
In light of the above, the Court asked the Additional Commissioner of Police (Traffic) and the Inspector General of Police of Maharashtra to prepare a detailed mechanism to ensure that seized vehicles are moved immediately to designated storage areas and not left in public or residential spaces. 
 
It directed that a policy be framed under the supervision of the Principal Secretary (Home Department) and submitted to the Court.
 
The matter will next be heard on April 29.
 
Comments
orientalhabitat
4 days ago
Primarily, it seems to be a case of justice delayed. Hence the backlog. Poor governance??
kokkodil1
6 days ago
Bravo! Hope other municipalities in the country take note. I live in Kochi where this and other obstructions are not only an eyesore but a severe restriction to the use of footpaths or just paths by pedestrians.
saurabh.khanna
6 days ago
Means Public can park their vehicles on road side,
But traffic police can't do the same
Such a biased decision
Bombay HC Issues Notices to Maharashtra Govt, BMC, MPCB and CPCB on Carrying Capacity
Moneylife Digital Team 11 April 2025
Responding to a public interest litigation (PIL) filed to call for sustainable or carrying-capacity-based development in Mumbai, the Bombay High Court (HC) issued notices to the Maharashtra government, the BrihanMumbai Municipal...
30% of Primary Schools Have only 1 Teacher: Jharkhand HC Steps in
Moneylife Digital Team 10 April 2025
The Jharkhand High Court has issued strong directions to the Jharkhand staff selection commission (JSSC), demanding a clear timeline for appointing 26,000 school teachers as the state grapples with one of the worst teacher shortages...
Supreme Court Slams TN Governor RN Ravi for Inaction; Deems 10 Bills To Have Been Passed
Debayan Roy (Bar  and  Bench) 08 April 2025
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a Governor does not have a veto power to sit over bills sent to him by a state legislature.
 
A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan declared as illegal Tamil Nadu Governor RN...
Delhi High Court Slaps Rs25,000 Cost on Shazia Ilmi for Suppression of Facts in Case against Rajdeep Sardesai
Bhavini Srivastava (Bar  and  Bench) 04 April 2025
The Delhi High Court today imposed a cost of 25,000 on Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Shazia Ilmi for suppressing facts in her defamation suit against India Today journalist Rajdeep Sardesai.
 
The defamation suit was filed by...
Array
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback