File an Intervention Application in the SC before April 30, 2012 being the next day of hearing of writ 383/2011. It will cost u just Rs1400. Better form a registered association of like minded panelists and file a single application. Read how at http://behindmlm.com/companies/speak-asi....
No Effort No Result.
Better get together an association of like-minded panelists and file FIR in you city. With an association you may be able to file an FIR with the EoW of your State. Read all about it from the posts being made at http://behindmlm.com/companies/speak-asi...
I am also a Penalist. My wife and duaghter too are penalists. Having invested Rs.33000/-(11000 each) and filled up surveys too, our entire money seems to have sunk. I do not even know where and how to file our claim to seek refund of our investment as per the SC order of Feb.2012.
I am unable to log on to speakasia as it is always displaying error.
The telephone numbers shown in one of the sites for Sales Support Hotline for India do not exist. These number as shown on the site are: 91-11-46488000 and 91-11-46170511. Both are non- existant.
I wonder if someone can guide us how and where to file claim and become a party to the plaint to be decided by the SC appointed mediator.
What is being decided or already decided in the SC is Civil Writ 383/2011 in favour of 115 panelists under Jonathan James & Othrs. Period. Most of these panelists from Delhi and neighboring areas are leaders and others who had invested heavily in SAOL. There can be no further additions to it. This is no Exit Option as professed by the likes of AISPA, SAOL & Others.
See if you can team up with other panelists you know or in your area (say) about 200-500 of them and then file a Civil Writ in the Supreme Court with your advocating case #383/2011 then you all would have a great chance of not only recovering your membership fees but also your RP while the cost of the case would get debited to SAOL including legal expenses.
Feb 23, 2012 Bombay High Court Order:
WP(C) 383 of 2011
1
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 383 OF 2011
SOLOMON JEMES & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With application for impleadment, directions, stay and office
report)
Date: 23/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Sibal, Adv.
Mr. Sushil K. Tekriwal, Adv.
Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya, Adv.
Dr. (Ms.) Mamta Tekriwal, Adv.
Mr. Rajiv K. Raj, Adv.
For Applicant (s)
In IA 2 Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Yadav, Adv.
in IA 3 Mr. Ashutosh Jha, Adv.
Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari ,Adv
In IA 4 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Aneesh Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv.
For Rrs 3 & 4 Ms. Jyoti Singh, Adv.
Mr. Narhari Singh, Adv.
Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv.
For UOI Ms. Indira Jaisingh, ASG.
Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Adv.
Ms. Supriya Jain, Adv.
Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv.
WP(C) 383 of 2011
2
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
…2/-
In pursuance to the directions of this Court
dated 6th February, 2012, respondent Nos. 3 and 4
have deposited an amount of US $ 10 million by
way of a bank draft bearing DD No. 037002 dated
20th February, 2012 drawn on State Bank of India,
Singapore Branch in favour of “The Registrar,
Supreme Court of India” in the Registry of this
Court.
Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 and
4 submits that this amount be deposited in a
fixed deposit for a period of 91 days initially
with the UCO Bank, Supreme Court Compound, on an
auto renewal basis. This request seems to be
reasonable and we order accordingly.
We also direct the Secretary General of this
Court to invest the amount today itself in the
UCO Bank, Supreme Court Compound for a period of
91 days on auto renewal basis.
With these directions, this application
stands disposed of. However, it is made clear
that the disbursement of the amount would be
subject to further orders of this Court.
Learned Additional Solicitor General
undertakes to file an affidavit.. She may do so
within a period of two weeks. Reply, if any,
thereto be filed within two weeks thereafter.
“…..this application stands disposed off”. Does this mean the matter of 383/2011 stands closed and only on SC orders the money will be distributed? Whatever happened to the demand that was to be raised by Justice Lahoti on SAOL? Has this Bahirwani/SAOL preempted Justice Lahoti’s move of a bigger demand?
Again, this Bahirwani chap at its AISPA has stated that at the 3611/2011 hearing in Bombay High Court on Feb 23rd, EoW had stated that the Supreme Court had allowed them to continue their investigation and that the Bombay High Court had asked it to place that order with them.
Again, this Bahirwani chap has also stated something about arm twisting by Navniit Kkhosla and the Bombay High Court censoring him for it. Is it true or is Bahirwani just hallucinating or in desperation become schizophrenic in not being able to keep his flock of brainwashed panelists in line after a series of court cases going against his beloved SAOL?
Please comment only from learned people like those of moneylife would be appreciated.
The order clearly says 'this application stands disposed off" and at the start of this order it is mentioned as (With application for impleadment, directions, stay and office
report)
In other words, the case would continue to be heard, while this particular applications is disposed off. If you read below, the ASG is allowed to file an affidavit in two weeks before the court. If the case is dismissed, then how will she file it? Hope this clears your doubt.
Thanks
@Sandesh
What happened to the demand on SAOL that was to be raised by Retd. Justice Lahoti and the deposit of the same with the Secretary General of the SC within two weeks of raising of the demand as per the last order of the SC in case #383/2011. The $10 million that has been deposited by SAOL seems to have no relation with the demand to be raised by Retd. Justice Lahoti.
star tv india ne speak asia ke maa behan ek kar de aur com. band karva ke he dam lia.laken uske baad jo log com. se jude the unke bare me kuch nahe socha ke unka paise kaise vapis hoge laken com.agar aaj jude logo ka paise return karte hai to ye star news ke ga
al par karara thappad hoga.
The banks were indeed given a notice by RBI which triggered the stoppage of transactions for Speakasia. I just stopped reading this article after seeing the incorrect news about RBI. You could check any banks for the circular which was sent in May by RBI. Plus if you see what the court has said in it's statement you would not have made the wrong statement.
Dear Parasmani,
While, several panellists are feeling that it is the RBI that has stopped their payment, they fail to understand that the central bank does not have any jurisdiction in Singapore from where the account freezing process started. Banks in India have not frozen any account of Speak Asia, as the company does not have an account in the country under its own name.
Indian banks have frozen several accounts of distributors after the investigations by the income-tax and sales tax departments. Unfortunately, many agents are still under the impression that the RBI has frozen Speak Asia's bank accounts and that they would get their money as soon as it is released. http://www.moneylife.in/article/78/19553...
I am of the opinion that the term "petitioners" that the Supreme Court has referred to in its order of Feb 6, 2012 implies only the petitioners of case number 383/2011, i.e. 115 panelists under the banner of Solomon James & Others. Just like Respondent 6 means the EoW holding the list. The rest of the panelists can just lump it. It is for this very reason that Secretary of AISPA, Ashok Bharwani has been stating that Rs50 crores (presumably the dues to the 115 panelists which includes membership fees of 11k plus survey/binary income due to them) will be deposited with the Secretary General of the Supreme Court. This Ashok has been chirping to his "brainwashed" panelists who are members of his AISPA that this is a favourable decision of the SC for restarting of SAOL. Crap! The SC order does not refer to anything but payment to the petitioners. Also his brainwashed panelists can hope for a future filing of a similar case in the SC provided the Jonathan James' panelists actually get their dues back. But then that is another matter and also dependent on SAOL yet having the balance of crores just to refund the membership fees. Forget the RPs.
4 doctors of Max Hospital held guilty of negligence; anxious father
Following the death of his daughter due to medical negligence in Delhi’s posh Max Hospital, the aggrieved father invoked 50 RTI applications in various departments to seek justice. Last week’s order by CIC Shailesh Gandhi provides some hope
‘Lucrative’ assignments: A Messy Saga
Top bureaucrats and chairmen of banks and public sector entities (barring a few honourable exceptions) are guilty of corruption and looting of public assets. However, their political godfathers ensure that they escape strict action
Harshad Mehta Scam: A Distorted Picture of 1992
Even after a 20-year effort, the special court is discussing the possibility of pushing the hearings. The only major beneficiaries have been India's lawyers, whose incomes rose by a factor of 10 or more
El Niño possibility lowers normal monsoon forecast
According to Rajan Alexander of Dev Consult Group, which tracks international weather forecasts, the El Niño appears to be virtually struggling to establish itself for the last couple of months. Experts say that considering that the large part of country is already in a drought-like situation, the news will severely impact Indian farming community
What's Hot Recent Additions
RIL does not hold stake in any media company – True or It may be true that on paper, RIL does not hold any stake in any media company, as the minister stated in Rajya Sabha. However, the Reliance group now openly controls Eenadu TV
Did New India overcharge lakhs of policyholders? – II New India Assurance admitted that a software glitch resulted in overcharging mediclaim premium, but has dragged its feet on providing information. It now says that it gave a wrong
Daily cleansing for the mind Breathe away to happiness and glory! Bath for the mind consists in daily replacing our negative thoughts like hatred greedy, jealousy, anger and pride with positive thoughts like
Did New India Assurance overcharge lakhs of mediclaim Is New India Assurance sitting on crores of extra premium collected due to a software glitch? It does not even know how many policyholders paid excess premium and is stonewalling
President Pratibha Patil’s luxurious home continues to The 2,42,000 sq ft of land in Pune returned by President Patil is to be ‘suitably’ used for an alternative purpose. Communication from the ministry of defence is
DISCLAIMER: This article is written purely in the public interest. While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information provided on this page is accurate, Moneywise Media Pvt Ltd and its group companies (together called as ‘Moneylife’) will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through its site(s).