My take on this issue is as follows:
1. The Govt is authorised by law to collect taxes from its citizens, as may be approved by parliament.
2.Rule making is a process of delegated legislation to allow facilitation of this process of tax collection.
3.By a process of empowerment the Govt sub-delegates this function of tax collection to certain third party agencies like banks, employers etc.
4.The relationship between Govt. and these agencies should be as between Principal and Agent.
5. As far as citizens are concerned, when these agencies recover TDS from their entitlements, it is as good as Govt. having collected its taxes and the citizens are absolved of paying taxes, to the extent collected by these agencies.
6. The recourse Govt. has against these agencies is as between Principal and Agent and Govt cannot penalise the citizens for what its agents do not do as per its empowerment.
7.The agents are duty bound to account to the citizens what it has recovered from them and such account(and to that extent) should be legally a discharge of obligation by the citizen.
8.Rules of empowerment should provide a recourse to citizens against the Govt./Agents if they do not give account of their actions to the concerned citizens.
In my view Income-tax rules which are violative of the above can and should be challenged by some public-spirited lawyers as being patently unfair to citizens!
Points 6,7,8 need to be addressed.
The worse sufferers are not-liable-to-tax elders, pensioners and widows. Based on age as declared in KYC there should not be any TDS. Any takers?
Its good to read such articles on the subject of problems faced by tax payers. The herculean task of getting a tax refund from the tax department is more difficult than climbing the Mt. Everest even for a qualified CA - let alone the common man. The frustration that one feels while dealing with the taxman on this issue is serious. Unless the FM wakes up to this, a day is not far off when the tax payers will be forced to resort to violence to get their tax refunds.
Thanks Ameetbhai for alluding to a CA having to climb Mt. Everest!
When I couldn't collect the refund due to me, I had to approach the Income Tax Ombudsman.
The ITO not only got my undertaking typed at his cost at his office and the covering letter too.
I got it in my capacity as an assessee, not CA!
I can very well sympathise with the ex-IRS CIT on his tax refund. Some time back I was present at a meet of senior civil servants - former Chief Secretaries and Municipal Commissioners with the Chairman IRDA - they were complaining of delays in settling of Mediclaim dues.
Not long ago pursuant to an article Tedious TDS by Gurpur, a regular contributor to these columns and the tremendous comments on TDS concerns, MoneyLife Foundation submitted a Memorandum to the Finance Minister, Ministry, CBDT and Governor RBI. We understand the Governor has promptly issued instructions to rectify the situation.
In case there are still hick ups, the Customer Services Departments of the RBI and Grievance Cells of the institutions are to be approached.
With the KYC norms in place all over the financial sector, the dates of birth are captured for all transactions. The GOI may as well exempt Sr. Citizens harassment by not subjecting them to TDS.
It'll make the assesses, bankers and AOs happy, because it'll reduce their botheration substantially.
Mr. Kini may be surprised to know, taking a cue from the discussions in this very site on the PIO hoax under the ludicrous RTI regime, that the grievance cells of all organisations are hearing-impaired with absolute zero sighting power. As the ex IRS officer has stated, the Ombudsmen in the IT deptt., posts which are given invariably to the most docile, useless, moneymaking and listless retired officers (who can afford to buy favours having already amassed the capital to invest in the future), are just figureheads with no teeth and are also NOT supposed to rock the boat. They are, like one has mentioned in the above mentioned discussion on the bogus PIOs, just instruments to fool the naive public--a wonderful system evolved by the IAS/bureaucracy to safeguard their political bosses. TDS refund, or any IT refund, remains a vast ocean of harassment and poisonous source of corruption and tax fraud. One ITP, specialised in claiming bogus and fradulent income tax refunds over the last five decades, still operates with impunity to make money from this very source despite computerisation, while lakhs and laklhs of tax payers are waiting for their rightful refunds of excess tax deduction for years and there is just no way out. A dozen of CBDT chairmen have joined and retred to greener pastures since the wonderful system was staryed, same being the case with the PSU and other (dubious) private sector bank CMDs/CEOs. But the miseries never cease, resulting in many tax payers deciding NOT to file any returns! There is no law either to protect these tax payers from state atrocity and the deliberate omission of the banks in filing TDS returns. In fact, SBI's Kolkata branches refuse even to issue TDS certificates despite repeated visits by the customers, senior citizens included.
Can the likes of Mr. Kini please show us the light? Memoranda to the FM, the migratory CBDT Chairmen and Revenue Secs would bring no solace. The tax payers perhaps need a Kishenji to fight for them!
Hey Ram!
Abanji,
I disagree with the odd terminology that you apply to PIOs and RTI. Apparently it is a result of some unpleasant experiences that you might have had with the applications that you filed.
That RTI has been able to obtain the desired result has been proved beyond doubt.
If any query is focused and properly framed, there is no way the PIO can wriggle out.
The responses that I have received for PIOs of RBI, IRDA, Mumbai Municipal Corporation, New India Assurance, Slum Rehabilitation Authority among others, have been quite up to the mark.
But for this Act none of the scams exposed would have seen the light of the day.
There are some hiccups in procedures that need to be attended to.
Thank you for this article. As a retired Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, I have myself been facing this problem resulting in the old department raising huge demands against me for successive years. The Banks (SBI in particular) are not bothered at all. When the Ombudsman (years junior to me) in Delhi was approached, the said person advised me to get in touch with the AO! I am waiting for refunds for years and the CBDT cites its system failure!
Banks are not the only ones. The entire system is rotten and meant to punish the honest taxpayer only.
Have yet to hear any tax deductor being punished for not issuing TDS certificates or for not uploading tax deduction data correctly.
We are spending so much of our productive time trying to sort out this nonsense which has now spread to the CPC of the Income tax. We have received notices for years where we have received refunds - just because there is a huge disconnect between the IT offices.
as regards to the point able to deposit amount beyond Rs 70,000/- in a paricular branch the two possibilities are
the branch where remittance was not done may not be still in the CBS network of SBI or alternatively they have misled u.
please SMS Unhappy in 8008202020 and customer service dept of SBI will get back to u and u should get a clear position.
Similarly unless customer complains over mail it will never reach the higher ups and also e-mail complaints will help you to maintain record of complaint so that one can identify where the response as sloppy.
also some reader please enlighten me as to how TDS recovered remitted @20% gets accounted ( as the PAN details of Tax Payer is not with Bank when they recover TDS) . In this connection i found that the FD receipts of IOB comes printed with Customer ID , so when PAN is available/recorded in this Customer ID the TDS if deducted by Bank atleast get reflected to PAN of the customer with Income Tax in 26AS.
LIC cannot excuse itself by telling that they have got the job out sourced.
Naturally, PPM. One just cannot become CEO/CMD of any bank without being a serf of those who run the govt. through their payments to the ruling class of the superior people! What to talk of these high page-3 authorities, one cannot even see a branch manager of SBI or PSU banks and not even the smallest employee of a pvt bank, thanks in the latter case to the PVRS system! The plain truth is:the common man must suffer unless one is at least a Grade-IV staff of MCD or DDA or a Govt. hospital (especially in Bengal where they continue to run and administer these hell holes called Govt. hospitals) or any public utility service provider or, of course, in the traditionally torturing departments like the police, ITO, STO, RTO, etc.
Nationalised branches are supposed to maintain waiting list for lockers and as and when vacancy arises the person in the Q is required to be intimated. Please go the branch Manager to give u a waiting list No and then u will see a totally different reaction
Tax:Travails of a common man
Honest taxpayers suffer when any agency, whether SBI, LIC or UTI or whoever, that do not file their Form 26 AS, and thus make you liable for double taxation to the extent of the TDS
What's Hot Recent Additions
RIL does not hold stake in any media company – True or It may be true that on paper, RIL does not hold any stake in any media company, as the minister stated in Rajya Sabha. However, the Reliance group now openly controls Eenadu TV
Did New India overcharge lakhs of policyholders? – II New India Assurance admitted that a software glitch resulted in overcharging mediclaim premium, but has dragged its feet on providing information. It now says that it gave a wrong
Daily cleansing for the mind Breathe away to happiness and glory! Bath for the mind consists in daily replacing our negative thoughts like hatred greedy, jealousy, anger and pride with positive thoughts like
Did New India Assurance overcharge lakhs of mediclaim Is New India Assurance sitting on crores of extra premium collected due to a software glitch? It does not even know how many policyholders paid excess premium and is stonewalling
President Pratibha Patil’s luxurious home continues to The 2,42,000 sq ft of land in Pune returned by President Patil is to be ‘suitably’ used for an alternative purpose. Communication from the ministry of defence is
DISCLAIMER: This article is written purely in the public interest. While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information provided on this page is accurate, Moneywise Media Pvt Ltd and its group companies (together called as ‘Moneylife’) will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through its site(s).