Moneylife » Investing » Investing » Revisiting some popular beliefs in investments
Revisiting some popular beliefs in investments
We often follow herd mentality and make investments. Though there is ample scope to evaluate things on a logical basis, investors tend to ignore them very often, as in the context of returns, these don’t make much difference
The world of investment runs on some popular beliefs. These beliefs have evolved a period of time. We often hear people say, “Invest for long period of time”, “Do not put all eggs in one basket”, etc. While some of these beliefs qualify the science of logic, there are many which are followed blindly as we often forget to apply appropriate logic to evaluate them. While going through an article published in a leading personal finance magazine, I came across a statement which stated that option buyer’s gains are unlimited while losses are limited. The statement sounds ok until it is dug deep. Let us look at this statement and many similar beliefs/ statements which are used in day-to-day conversation in finance but may not be logical.
Higher the risk, higher the return: This is the most used statement in the world of investment and finance. But is it appropriate to say that higher risk results in higher return? The statement somehow gives the impression that if an individual takes more risk, he will get more returns. Practically this does not work out like this. The appropriate statement should have been “Higher the risk, higher the expected return”. With usage of word, “expected return”, a clear-cut picture comes out. The statement now means that if an individual takes higher risk, he can expect higher returns while he is not assured of it.
Option buyers have unlimited gains but limited losses: It is very often said that buyer’s of option contract have unlimited gains but limited losses. While this is absolutely fine as far as call option buyers are concerned, it is inappropriate to say the same thing about put option buyer. When a person purchases put option his losses are indeed limited but so are gains. What is the maximum gain that an investor can make in case of put option? When the price of the spot falls, the put option buyer starts making profit. It is open secret that spot price cannot fall below zero, so the gains naturally become limited. For example, in case of put option on Ashok Leyland for a strike price of Rs27.50 the maximum gain that a put option buyer can expect is Rs27.50 per contract and not more than that.
PPF is a risk-free investment: Public Provident Fund (PPF) means safety and assured returns to almost all the investors. Very few would even bother to listen to you if you say that PPF investment has a risk element in it—but hang on. PPF indeed carries risk and that is called as “reinvestment risk”. The rate of interest on PPF deposits have been changing over a period of time and as a result of this an investor who opens a PPF account or an existing investor cannot expect the same rate of return every year. Because of this reason, PPF can be classified as an investment option which has a risk but only reinvestment risk. The credit risk in PPF can be ignored based on the history.
The problem in finance is that we have often follow herd mentality and make investments based on what masses do. Though there is ample scope of evaluate things on a logical basis, investors tend to ignore them very often as in context of returns these don’t make much difference. We should all try to be what we are assumed to be, “Rational Investors”.
(Vivek Sharma has worked for 17 years in the stock market, debt market and banking. He is a post graduate in Economics and MBA in Finance. He writes on personal finance and economics and is invited as an expert on personal finance shows.)
More in Moneylife
Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning? +4149 views
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Post your Comment
| Alert me when new comment is posted on this article | |
| Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting | |
VIDEOS
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
LATEST COMMENT
MORE
BSE to shift 29 scrips to T group category for failure to comply with demat norms
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Take advantage of all our features and functionality exclusively designed for Moneylife.in members. Registration gives you easy access to - Moneylife Newsletters - Exclusive News - Special Features - Membership to Moneylife Foundation - Other Value adds And the registration to this website is completely free. Go ahead and submit this form to create your new profile. |
Tell us about yourself
I have read and agreed to the Terms & Conditions | |||||||||||||||||||
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Phaneesh Murthy saga: Why insurers should refuse to cover serial offenders of sexual harassment
- Sensex Rally: Winners and Losers as the index challenges the high of 2010
- India’s current account deficit set to worsen again in Q2 2013, says Nomura
- Why don’t funds promote trail commissions instead of upfront commissions?
- Vinod Rai demits office: A CAG that India will miss
- Additional Home Secretary on the edge to complete probe into tampering of 26/11 call log records
- Stock Guru scam: ED to attach properties of accused couple
- PI Industries Q4 revenues up 40% but net profit suffers
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- Cobrapost exposes money-laundering racket in 23 entities including SBI and LIC
- Do we need a regulator for ‘unclaimed’ deposits?
- Confusion between yield and rate of interest reflects financial illiteracy among business journalists
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Mass mis-selling: 59,000 investors in Kolhapur are alleged to have lost money in LIC ULIPs
- Vinod Rai demits office: A CAG that India will miss
- Sensex Rally: Winners and Losers as the index challenges the high of 2010
- Phaneesh Murthy saga: Why insurers should refuse to cover serial offenders of sexual harassment
- Additional Home Secretary on the edge to complete probe into tampering of 26/11 call log records
- Sunlight: The ‘be all and end all’ of human health
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- RTI exposes a revenue loss of Rs25,000 crore in Maharashtra
What's your say?
| Yes | |||||||
| No | |||||||
| Can't Say | |||||||
|
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
Membership Benefits
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai
| Name: |
|
| Email: |
|
| Phone: |
|
| Catagory | |
| Message: |
|
| Enter Code: |
|






























Comment
Sudheer M 6 months ago
Rightly mentioned Vivek... However, people believe that high returns is in the range of 70-80%, which is not correct. The average "Expected High Returns" with "High Risk" can be only in the range of 20%.
On a lighter note, people who are expecting a returns of 50% returns should look at a "Critical Risk, Critical Return" category, and only instrument i see in this category is "Lottery Ticket"