Googling for hot women celebrities can be risky for your computer!
McAfee has found out that Googling for hot celebrities like Emma Watson, Shakira, Salma Hayek and Kate Upton can be risky and also that searching for women is generally more dangerous than men
In a recent study, McAfee, a world leading security technology company dedicated to protection of internet users, has found that Googling for celebrities such as the Harry Potter movie actress Emma Watson, Justin Bieber’s girlfriend Selena Gomez and supermodels such as Kate Upton can be extremely risky. These celebrity searches are apparently a happy hunting ground for those seeking to infect computers with malicious viruses such as spyware, adware, spam, phishing, viruses and other malware, which can pose an online threat to the user. Interestingly, the 10 most dangerous searches listed by McAfee are all women and is a sort of ranking for the hottest women on the planet.
McAfee’s study found that searching for Emma Watson yields more than a 12.6% chance of landing on a website that is dangerous and malicious. Other celebrities featured in the list were noted singer Shakira, actresses Salma Hayek and Cameron Diaz. According to McAfee press release, it said, “Emma Watson has replaced Heidi Klum as McAfee’s 2012 most dangerous celebrity to search for online. The “McAfee Most Dangerous Celebrities” study found that women are more dangerous than men with Jessica Biel taking the number two spot and Eva Mendes coming in third. Latina women have proven that they are on fire and make up five of the top ten spots. After Mendes, Selena Gomez, Shakira and Salma Hayek take the fourth, seventh and ninth spot and Sofia Vergara rounds out the top 10 list. Funnyman Jimmy Kimmel is the only male to make the top 20 list this year.”
Apart from celebrities, it found out that searching for pictures and downloads of Latinas, musicians and supermodels were likely to lead to malicious websites. Surprisingly, celebrities such as Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, Kristen Stewart, and Robert Pattinson did not featured in their list despite their respective high profile stories carried recently. “Hot movies and TV shows, awards and industry accolades seem to be more of a factor than headline-grabbing activity,” said Paula Greve, director of web security research at McAfee. “Still, searching for any celebrity can bring up risky sites and the public should use caution by not clicking on any page that looks suspicious.”
While the press release doesn’t mention any Indians, not even the top-most searched Indians (Google Zeitgeist) were Katrina Kaif, Salman Khan, Anna Hazare, Poonam Pandey and Priyanka Chopra.
In this day and age of rapid content consumption on the internet and social media such as Twitter and Facebook, celebrities are making themselves more accessible to people. The negative side to this is that celebrities and internet users become easy target for cybercriminals. McAfee said, “Cybercriminals follow the latest trends, often using the names of popular celebrities to lure people to sites that are actually laden with malicious software that are designed to steal passwords and personal information. Anyone looking for the latest videos or files to download could end up with a malware-ridden computer along with the trendy content. This year, searching for a celebrity name with “free downloads” and “nude pictures” as part of the search term resulted in the highest result of risky sites.”
Furthermore, says Paula Greve, “As the sophistication and expectations of consumers with respect to their online experience has increased, so has the level and ability to deliver malware either by malvertising, exploiting the user’s browser without their awareness, or masking malicious URLs behind shortened URLs.”
Internet users are advised to be cautious and not click on suspicious looking URL or links presented by search results. McAfee has advised consumers to take the following precautions:
- • Beware of content that prompts you to download anything before providing you with content. You may want to opt to watch streaming videos or download content from an established site, such as Hulu, Netflix, NBC, or ABCtv.
- • Free downloads are significantly the highest virus-prone search terms. Anyone searching for videos or files to download should be careful not to unleash malware on their computer.
• Since most people use a variety of devices to search for celebrities, be sure you have up-to-date, comprehensive security for all of your devices. It’s important to have protection.
Internet users are also advised to keep their computer up-to-date by regularly updating their operating systems and keeping firewalls in place.
McAfee researched popular culture’s most famous people to reveal the riskiest Hollywood actors, athletes, musicians, politicians, designers, and comedians on the Web and came up with their McAfee Most Dangerous Celebrities which started six years back, as the internet presence grew bigger and posed a bigger threat to consumers.
More in Moneylife
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning?
- OMCs to stop LPG deliveries to houses with multiple-connections from 1st June
- BSE to shift 29 scrips to T group category for failure to comply with demat norms
- Sun TV Networks announces 11% jump in its net profit
- S&P cautions India of rating downgrade; retains negative outlook
- COMPAT orders cement cos to pay 10% of the Rs6,307 crore penalty
- ITC net profit up 19.4%, aided by non-cigarette and agri-business segments
- Vikram Pandit to buy stake in JM Financial, to head its proposed banking arm
- MMM India, another MLM taking people for “double-your-money” ride
- RBI tells HDFC Bank not to make up its own KYC verification rules
- Why I-T returns of Pawar, Jindal and Gandhi are exempted from RTI?
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Goa’s Advocate General is the highest paid across the country, reveals RTI
- Mass mis-selling: 59,000 investors in Kolhapur are alleged to have lost money in LIC ULIPs
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low – I? Maximum buying at peak index levels
- Investors lost Rs1 lakh crore due to poor regulation. Will there be a CBI probe?
- Directors of public sector banks: The ground reality
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–II? Momentum-chasing
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
- Has Rakesh Maria tried to salvage his image through Ram Gopal Varma’s film on the 26/11 attack?
What's your say?
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai