Are companies withholding information from the stock exchanges?
Media reports are not always the source of trouble for the company. But why are the exchanges not taking any action to curb such reports?
The saga of companies, denying price-sensitive media reports continues and since the bourses merely act as post offices, investors remain clueless and confused. In a single day on 2 March 2012, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) reported these corporate clarifications in its daily press release. Here is the upshot:
On 1 March 2012, Economic Times reported that Pantaloon Retail plans to exit the joint venture with Staples Inc. It had the photograph of Kishore Biyani, CEO of Future Group and it said quoting him that Pantaloon’s exit from the joint venture with Staples is part of the group’s strategy to raise funds and focus on fewer yet scalable businesses such as food and fashion. Mr Biyani added, “We are looking at exiting such non-core business, including joint ventures.”
Following the report, the NSE sought a clarification from the company. Pantaloon Retail (India) stated, “We deny any such transaction at this stage. We shall inform about any firm and binding decision no sooner approved by the board, to the regulators and our shareholders, as required by law.” NSE has dutifully posted this response. So, whom does the investor believe?
The press release was an anti-climax and Pantaloon Retail (India) was trading on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) at Rs181.50 (0.06% down from the previous close). The 52-week high and low for the share price was Rs364.15 and Rs125.30, respectively. The share price is stable and well away from both the 52-week high and low. Shouldn’t the NSE at least report this to SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India)?
Another case is that of Bajaj Finserv. The NSE saw a media report of Bajaj Finserv planning to buy Fidelity India's mutual fund business. The NSE sought clarifications from Bajaj Finserv and it gave a press release which read: "We wish to inform you that as of now, we have no such proposal under consideration." The Bajaj Finserv share price is at a stable Rs633.30 (0.2% down from its previous close).
In both the above cases, clearly the investors are left clueless. So, were the media reports baseless? The first report even quoted the promoter. There is a strong case that companies are withholding information from the stock exchange and consequently from the public.
Media reports are not always the source of trouble for the company. Nuchem was questioned by the NSE for non-compliance with certain provisions of the listing agreement. The company could not provide satisfactory replies to the queries raised. The NSE press release read: “The equity shares of Nuchem will be suspended from trading with effect from 12 March 2012 (i.e. closing hours of trading on 09 March 2012) until further notice on the capital market segment of the National Stock Exchange of India for non-compliance with certain provisions of the listing agreement”.
In this case, there is no protection for the investor from volatility in the share price. The NSE has said that trading itself is suspended.
We have to wait and see how the NSE and BSE supervise listed companies and how the companies dodge the investors by withholding information from the stock exchanges.
More in Moneylife
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning?
- OMCs to stop LPG deliveries to houses with multiple-connections from 1st June
- BSE to shift 29 scrips to T group category for failure to comply with demat norms
- Sun TV Networks announces 11% jump in its net profit
- COMPAT orders cement cos to pay 10% of the Rs6,307 crore penalty
- S&P cautions India of rating downgrade; retains negative outlook
- ITC net profit up 19.4%, aided by non-cigarette and agri-business segments
- Vikram Pandit to buy stake in JM Financial, to head its proposed banking arm
- MMM India, another MLM taking people for “double-your-money” ride
- RBI tells HDFC Bank not to make up its own KYC verification rules
- Why I-T returns of Pawar, Jindal and Gandhi are exempted from RTI?
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Goa’s Advocate General is the highest paid across the country, reveals RTI
- Mass mis-selling: 59,000 investors in Kolhapur are alleged to have lost money in LIC ULIPs
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low – I? Maximum buying at peak index levels
- Investors lost Rs1 lakh crore due to poor regulation. Will there be a CBI probe?
- Directors of public sector banks: The ground reality
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–II? Momentum-chasing
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
- Has Rakesh Maria tried to salvage his image through Ram Gopal Varma’s film on the 26/11 attack?
What's your say?
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai